This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL100 blindbattle

    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
      SB ($15)
      BB ($48.26)
      UTG ($28.48)
      UTG+1 ($25.35)
      CO ($23.58)
      Hero ($22.13)

      Dealt to Hero K:diamond: T:diamond:

      fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $2.50, fold, BB raises to $8, Hero raises to $22.13 (AI), BB calls $14.13




      This was just a bad move imo. But I wonder, do we ever have FE in such a spot to justify some looser 4 betting?
  • 2 replies
    • Nunki
      Nunki
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.10.2006 Posts: 865
      I think raise/folding is slightly better than as played. Your 4bet has 0 FE versus any sensible player (including this one) since villain gets >2:1 on his call.
    • Gerv
      Gerv
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 17,678
      Hi Dandy,

      what are YOUR table stats/dynamics on that specific table? So what I mean is: what was your steal frequency, were you very active with 3betting/openraising/isolating etc. Same goes for him as Villain

      $22.13+$2.5+$0.5*0.95 against $19 gives 44% BEQ

      Despite is high resteal activity, I think you do not get the necessary equity with KTs against a range. You are almost never ahead with KTs and mostly way behind as in 33% equity~

      Since you are only openraising 2.5bb, I just muck it with KTs but still interesting hand against a 48bb guy..

      - Gerv