This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50 FR AK in BU vs 4 bet (deepstack)

    • Volrath89
      Volrath89
      Bronze
      Joined: 23.07.2008 Posts: 2,171
      No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (10 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

      MP3 ($50)
      CO ($49.25)
      Hero (Button) ($120.05)
      SB ($109.97)
      BB ($54.84)
      UTG ($102.90)
      UTG+1 ($47.68)
      UTG+2 ($118.14)
      MP1 ($49.25)
      MP2 ($55.86)

      Preflop: Hero is Button with A, K
      6 folds, CO bets $1.75, Hero raises $5.50, SB raises $12.25, 3 folds

      Total pot: $13.25


      CO Stats:
      VPIP/PFR/AF/WTS/hands
      15/11/1.9/27/396
      CO Open Raise: 21%

      SB Stats:


      This fold felt soo weak =/

      Ok, so i think 5bet/fold was probably a good line to avoid problems, 5bet/push is probably overplayed being deepstack, isnt it?

      I think I could also cold call and play postflop, right? but it felt so complicated than I rather fold preflop lol
  • 2 replies
    • DaPhunk
      DaPhunk
      Bronze
      Joined: 01.03.2008 Posts: 2,805
      I had an incredibly similar hand the other week which I also gave up preflop which I also gave up. I'd be interested to see Judges opinion here too.

      5bet/fold as SB can think we are just restealing CO loose thus we have much FE against an expanded range?
    • Kaitz20
      Kaitz20
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      Players would very rarely 4-bet there as a bluff and a lot of times they have KK+. I also like fold, since you´re deep and against KK+ you´re not that well postflop that you should call ip.
      Don´t think I like 5-bet/fold that much. If you put him on weaker range than KK+, then imo you should call ip and play postflop.