This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl10Fr:22

    • kosmonaut111
      Joined: 26.01.2009 Posts: 715
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)

      Known players:

      Preflop: Hero is SB with 2, 2.
      UTG1 folds, UTG2 calls $0.10, MP1 calls $0.10, 3 folds, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.05, BB checks.

      Flop: ($0.5) 2, 5, 4 (5 players)
      Hero bets $0.41, BB folds, UTG2 calls $0.41, MP1 raises to $1.20(All-In), BU calls $1.20, Hero calls $0.79, UTG2 raises to $1.58, BU calls $0.79, Hero calls $0.79.

      Turn: ($7.67) K (4 players)
      Hero checks, UTG2 bets $0.10, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.10.

      River: ($7.97) T (4 players)
      Hero checks, UTG2 bets $0.10, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.10.

      Final Pot: $8.27.

      Decided to limp, because there were already 3 limpers.
      Now have a weird situation: hit bottom set and get some action. In raised pot it is nobrainer AI I guess, but here I dont know. They could easily have higher set, straight. I read now super system and had in mind, that this is place where you can play set very cautiosly. Is my play correct here ? Thought about betting on turn or river.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      imo board is so drawy that you should play your bottom set aggressively, especially when one player is all-in. I´d make 4$ after MP1 shoved. Players would get there all-in with worse hands than yours, so I don´t see any reason why you should play your set cautiously