[NL2-NL10] Nl10Fr:22

    • kosmonaut111
      kosmonaut111
      Bronze
      Joined: 26.01.2009 Posts: 715
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)

      Known players:
      UTG1:
      $19.50
      UTG2:
      $8.87
      MP1:
      $1.30
      MP2:
      $10.00
      MP3:
      $24.90
      CO:
      $9.98
      BU:
      $11.95
      SB(Hero):
      $10.00
      BB:
      $12.65


      Preflop: Hero is SB with 2, 2.
      UTG1 folds, UTG2 calls $0.10, MP1 calls $0.10, 3 folds, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.05, BB checks.

      Flop: ($0.5) 2, 5, 4 (5 players)
      Hero bets $0.41, BB folds, UTG2 calls $0.41, MP1 raises to $1.20(All-In), BU calls $1.20, Hero calls $0.79, UTG2 raises to $1.58, BU calls $0.79, Hero calls $0.79.

      Turn: ($7.67) K (4 players)
      Hero checks, UTG2 bets $0.10, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.10.

      River: ($7.97) T (4 players)
      Hero checks, UTG2 bets $0.10, BU calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.10.

      Final Pot: $8.27.

      Decided to limp, because there were already 3 limpers.
      Now have a weird situation: hit bottom set and get some action. In raised pot it is nobrainer AI I guess, but here I dont know. They could easily have higher set, straight. I read now super system and had in mind, that this is place where you can play set very cautiosly. Is my play correct here ? Thought about betting on turn or river.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Kaitz20
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      imo board is so drawy that you should play your bottom set aggressively, especially when one player is all-in. I´d make 4$ after MP1 shoved. Players would get there all-in with worse hands than yours, so I don´t see any reason why you should play your set cautiously