This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl5 Fr 33

    • JazzyJasper
      Joined: 06.06.2008 Posts: 93
      Known players:

      0.02/0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.69 by

      Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 3:heart: , 3:diamond:
      UTG1 calls $0.05, 2 folds, MP2 raises to $0.20, Hero calls $0.20, CO folds, BU calls $0.20, SB raises to $0.50, 2 folds, MP2 calls $0.30, Hero calls $0.30, BU calls $0.30.

      Flop: ($2.10) 4:club: , 5:club: , 2:heart: (4 players)
      SB bets $0.50, MP2 folds, Hero calls $0.50, BU raises to $2.30, SB raises to $4.10, Hero calls $3.56 (All-In), BU raises to $6.38 (All-In), SB calls $0.92 (All-In), BU gets uncalled bet back.

      Turn: ($16.20) 9:diamond:
      River: ($16.20) 7:spade: (1 players)

      Final Pot: $16.20

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      Hero shows a pair of threes (3h 3d)
      SB shows a pair of jacks (Jd Jc)
      BU shows three of a kind, fours (4h 4s)

      BU wins with three of a kind, fours (4h 4s)

      Was this good play? I was pretty sure someone had the better of me with a set, but I think I couldn't lay this down because of the pot odds + dead money. is this true or did I make a mistake in that?
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510

      Given the action we have between 10 and 6 outs, depending on how insane SB really is, since BU seems reasonable so far and probably has a set or a huge flushdraw. It's probably really close, imo it's a fold with 6 outs and a call with 10 outs, if we average it to 8 outs it's probably still a decent call given how maniacal SB looks unless i screw up the pot odds calculus.

      Hope it helps.