This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] should have checked the river

    • shortfuse
      Joined: 02.07.2009 Posts: 450
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.25/$0.5 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:

      Preflop: Hero is MP3 with A, Q.
      MP2 folds, Hero raises to $2.00, 2 folds, SB calls $1.75, BB calls $1.50.

      Flop: ($6) A, K, 6 (3 players)
      SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $4.27, SB folds, BB calls $4.27.

      Turn: ($14.54) J (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $9.86, BB calls $9.86.

      River: ($34.26) 5 (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $15.50, BB raises to $35.00, Hero calls $19.50.

      Final Pot: $104.26.
      Results follow:

      Hero shows a pair of aces(A Q).
      BB shows a flush, ace high(8 A).

      BB wins with a flush, ace high(8 A).

      grrr stupid value bet
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510

      The better he is the less value there is on the river since decent players won't show up there and call a third bet on the river without at least AQ. If he's a bad player it's fine to valuebet again against worse Ax hands.

      When he raises the river i think you're dead most of the time, unless you weakish bet somehow induced a bluff raise which it rarely will. You're looking at 2 pairs+ always on the value side. I think it's a fold even with those odds, but you can't fault a call too much either.

      Hope it helps.