2+2 talking 'bout pokerstrategy.com

  • 19 replies
    • tcs35
      tcs35
      Bronze
      Joined: 31.01.2009 Posts: 3,583
      i lolled when i first saw it
    • elhh82
      elhh82
      Bronze
      Joined: 03.09.2008 Posts: 6,838
      they even misspelled the site name.

      its Pokserstrategy.com there. "Pokser"
    • kingdippy2008
      kingdippy2008
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.08.2008 Posts: 2,107
      Originally posted by elhh82
      they even misspelled the site name.

      its Pokserstrategy.com there. "Pokser"
      Pokerstrategy is a banned word there :/
    • justkyle88
      justkyle88
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 7,596
      2p2 is so bad they can't even spell poker..lol
    • luvr7
      luvr7
      Bronze
      Joined: 01.07.2009 Posts: 16
      I think it really doesn't matter and don't understand the competitiveness here. As an aspiring player shouldn't you be keen to learn from as many good sources as possible? Yes the 2+2 forum is bigger but the forum is not the main focus of PokserStrategy.com, not by far. I don't see the point in the sites dissing each other. It's not like you're tied to one or the other and I'm sure many people go to both sites even if they aren't posting here.
    • Waiboy
      Waiboy
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.09.2008 Posts: 4,877
      Originally posted by luvr7
      I think it really doesn't matter and don't understand the competitiveness here. As an aspiring player shouldn't you be keen to learn from as many good sources as possible? Yes the 2+2 forum is bigger but the forum is not the main focus of PokserStrategy.com, not by far. I don't see the point in the sites dissing each other. It's not like you're tied to one or the other and I'm sure many people go to both sites even if they aren't posting here.
      +1 - my thoughts exactly.

      Of course the fact that so many people don't get this suggests plenty of people aren't maximising their chances to improve their games. This I like. :s_cool:
    • Kruppe
      Kruppe
      Black
      Joined: 20.02.2008 Posts: 2,144
      pokerstrategy just produces barely-breakeven TAGfish rake machines, ldo
    • MikeB570
      MikeB570
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.05.2009 Posts: 72
      Read through the whole thread and I really don't understand what the point is.
    • SheepMoose
      SheepMoose
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.01.2009 Posts: 854
      Originally posted by MikeB570
      Read through the whole thread and I really don't understand what the point is.
      Some people advertise TAF links/PS links, 2p2 states that as it's not advertisement that was paid for by pokerstrategy those links will all be deleted.

      2p2 bans the term "pokerstrategy" to make fighting against the spam easier.
    • DaPhunk
      DaPhunk
      Bronze
      Joined: 01.03.2008 Posts: 2,805
      Originally posted by Kruppe
      pokerstrategy just produces barely-breakeven TAGfish rake machines, ldo
      Like Me :D
    • PokerRoad
      PokerRoad
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.07.2009 Posts: 143
      What I cant understand is that they seem to be blaming us for the entire short stacking population online ..

      They seem to think this is just a strategy to lern sss . :s_evil: This wrecks my head, Iv never used that strategy in my life & personally dispise it & think there should be min buyin level of 60bb for every table but the poker site are to greedy to implament this as they will lose so much on rake.(but thats not my point)
      I just hate that we are being blamed for this & will now be paranoid that if I mention anywhere that im a PokerStrategy player that I will be labelled as a short stacker.
      They also say that the lerning content on here is bad & how could you take any advice from these losers. :s_evil: :s_evil: :s_evil: :s_evil:
      How can they say that, I for one have improved in a short time & as a direct result of this site & at no cost to me like other training sites.
      ISNT THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF TRAINING SITES to lern & improve as a player,how ever you manage to do that cant be a bad thing imo.
      Im also a 2+2 member but could not even bring myself to post on that thread I was to mad yesterday when reading it .


      Any one whould think they were all pros or something ... What a bunch of donks .


      But I have the solution ...
      I think and epic headsup tourney between 2+2 and us ..
      WE WILL CRUSH SOULS :s_cool:

      I, for (1 in 2.5 mil)l love this site :f_love: :s_love: :f_love: :s_love:
      brig it on 2+2 WE'LL AVE YE
    • tokyoaces
      tokyoaces
      Bronze
      Joined: 01.04.2009 Posts: 1,883
      There's a quite famous training site that constantly makes fun of 2+2 tagfish. It's just normal human tribal behavior. (Anyone who has studied sociology should know what I mean by that ...)
    • drdrab
      drdrab
      Bronze
      Joined: 11.06.2009 Posts: 37
      I've made profit thanks to this site, but i've noticed my live game has improved the most since coming here, which means i barely play online anymore. Maybe there's more fishies in my local casino.
    • mojojo16
      mojojo16
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.02.2009 Posts: 59
      2+2 is all americans who dont understnad how useful this site can be. besides, its the members here that take all the 2+2 money on the tables :)
    • EdgarAronov
      EdgarAronov
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.07.2009 Posts: 142
      Why does people hate shortstackers?? :f_confused: :f_confused:
      I am very happy, when in NL100 a shortstacker goes preflop all in when i hold aces, VERY
    • OrcaAoc
      OrcaAoc
      Gold
      Joined: 06.08.2006 Posts: 4,819
      Why does people hate shortstackers


      Because they make the games boring and dumb.
    • nafar84
      nafar84
      Bronze
      Joined: 20.09.2008 Posts: 546
      Originally posted by Kruppe
      pokerstrategy just produces barely-breakeven TAGfish rake machines, ldo
      That's it.. no more of this BS. I can't allow PS to suck the life out of me any longer. I'M TAKING THE RED PILL!!
    • Korn
      Korn
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.01.2005 Posts: 12,511
      Hi guys,

      background is that 2+2 head of marketing *TT* claimed that PokerStrategy.com was some kind of black hat SEO business faking it's traffic numbers. That's obviously not the case, though 2+2 might be forgiven for not noticing that PokerStrategy.com is essentially 17 pages in one, one for each language. We could conclusively proof to them that they were plain wrong and they agreed to post the said statements.

      Regarding the short stacks, being a poker player myself it's quite simple: people don't have anything against the short stacks per se they just don't like the fact that it is an easy to learn and profitable strategy. On the other, I actually am in favour of high minimum buy-in tables. However, people complaining about short stack players should be honest to themsevles and admit that they don't like them because they tend to be winning players. The same goes for "TAGs" or "nits" that are equally disregareded at 2p2.
    • SheepMoose
      SheepMoose
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.01.2009 Posts: 854
      Originally posted by mojojo16
      2+2 is all americans who dont understnad how useful this site can be. besides, its the members here that take all the 2+2 money on the tables :)
      LOL no...