Account frozen

    • hoffee
      Joined: 29.11.2008 Posts: 89
      Hey I wonder if anyone have had this problem;

      My account just got frozen at pokerstars.. this happend shortly after I withdraw some money... They're writing a list of people that have played in the same location as me. I've had my acc for 2 years... and I have ofc. played with my mates, at my mates.. They know my password, so they go in and out occansianly if they want to transfer some money to their acc(If i let them).

      I had alot of money in my acc... So I just wonder if anyone have had the same problem?

      I need to fill out a scheme, of personals.. Do anyone know, if when I verify my details, that the account will be re-opened? or do this take ages, investigating etc?
  • 3 replies
    • Kimber88
      Joined: 08.07.2008 Posts: 1,333
      If you have had other people accessing your account with your permission you probably shouldn't tell Stars about that.

      I don't know their TOS by the letter, but I'm pretty sure they have the right to freeze your account because of that. Even if they haven't played under your name.

      I would just tell them (Stars) that I have played sessions with friends for the purpose of sweating each other and then of course you have had to log on from different places at different times.

      That bein said I think you should change your password and not let anybody use your account.
    • Menschdefekt
      Joined: 13.06.2009 Posts: 27
      [Edited by kingdippy2008] - Affiliate advertising (put whole story into quotes)

      Widespread but previously unverified reports of a Department of Justice-ordered seizure against three bank accounts operated by online poker sites servicing US players have now been confirmed, with the Poker Players Alliance announcing that as much as $33 million in temporarily frozen funds may be involved. The seizure centers on a rumored 24,000 accounts involving customers of Full Tilt, PokerStars and the Cereus Network (UltimateBet / Absolute Poker).

      Three separate banks were involved in the seizure, with the order emanating from the United States District Court of Southern New York. That U.S. district court has been at the focal point of Department of Justice efforts against various online gambling concerns and online-poker sites, which the DoJ maintains are illegal, though no case involving online poker has ever been tried. The New York district is the same one involved in prominent recent cases or settlements against NETeller, PartyGaming, and that company’s co-founder Anurag Dikshit, each of which involved a settlement of over $100 million.

      While the DoJ based its seizures here under the 1961 Wire Act , poker-only sites such as those affected by this latest order have long maintained that online poker is not covered by the cited laws. In fact, the latest seizures represent the first time that the United States' DoJ has attempted an action against entities associated only with online poker, as opposed to sportsbetting or casino gaming concerns. (Citing the pending legal situation, none of the online sites contacted for this story were able to provide a comment on the seizure.)

      Checks affected by the seizure were issued during a roughly one-week span in late May and early June, but not all checks were affected by the seizure, which in itself has already been alleged to be unlawful. In addition, alternate methods for re-sending payments to impacted players are already being put in place.

      The Poker Players Alliance quickly issued a statement protesting the seizure, citing several potential legal issues as outlined in a June 8th communication to the US Southern NY court. In its statement on the matter, the PPA promised some form of pending legal action, while also requesting the opportunity to be heard “in any future warrant hearings” regarding poker. From the PPA release:

      "The PPA is disappointed that this unprecedented action has been commenced against law abiding poker players. The payment processor funds frozen by the Southern District of New York belong to individual poker players - not operators of poker websites - and do not represent the proceeds of any gambling activity, much less illegal gambling activity. This money should be immediately released by the Southern District to ensure that player payouts are not further disrupted. To that end, the PPA is coordinating a legal strategy to appropriately protect PPA members who are impacted by the Southern District's actions. Further, the PPA has contacted the affected poker websites and has been informed that deposit and payout issues of players are being addressed and will be fully satisfied."

      From later in the PPA statement: "We are also concerned that the Southern District has selectively taken action against online poker when the current law regarding the activity is far from clear, and policies from various levels of government are inconsistent at best. In fact, no federal or state court has ever found a payment processor or a player accessing an Internet poker site to have violated the federal laws alleged by the Southern District in this case.”
    • kingdippy2008
      Joined: 30.08.2008 Posts: 2,107
      Hello Menschdefekt,

      Although your link was helpful, due to the amount of affiliated advertising down the side i removed the link as it is in breach of Board Rules (updated 15th May 2009) In particular rule 3;

      Rule No. 3: No advertising commercial offers of any sort!

      We cannot allow links to affiliate sites or the posting of bonus codes. The project is completely financed by our affiliate advertising. Without this we could not offer our support, articles, or live coaching. For this reason we must protect the interest of the entire community from foreign advertising. This includes indirect advertising for commercial offers!

      Good luck and best regards,