How much bb/100 does rake take at certain limits/variants?

    • JuiceQuadre
      JuiceQuadre
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.10.2008 Posts: 2,688
      Hi =) I was wondering how much bb/100 does rake take from your winnings at certain limits.
      Since i dont have PT3 or HEM right now i cant see any exact numbers from my own dtb.

      I wonder how does rake/100 lower when you hit limits where maxrake is getting into use.

      If anyone playing NL200 or higher would share with us some numbers i would be glad =) Im just curious =)

      Also if anyone playing other variants would share it would be nice =)
  • 10 replies
    • tuomasta
      tuomasta
      Bronze
      Joined: 04.01.2009 Posts: 234
      I looked at PT3 summary and there is all players who i have played against and how much they have been payed rake.

      Party NL25 6max
      35 023 Raked hands and rake payed 10 138$ so average rake is 1.15 bb/100

      but only winner have to pay rake. Like if you lose 25$ winner wins 23.5$

      I'm not sure if i am right... somebody clever than me can calculate that righ...
    • JuiceQuadre
      JuiceQuadre
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.10.2008 Posts: 2,688
      Originally posted by tuomasta
      I looked at PT3 summary and there is all players who i have played against and how much they have been payed rake.

      Party NL25 6max
      35 023 Raked hands and rake payed 10 138$ so average rake is 1.15 bb/100

      but only winner have to pay rake. Like if you lose 25$ winner wins 23.5$

      I'm not sure if i am right... somebody clever than me can calculate that righ...
      Hmmm well the more we win the more rake we pay. Thats why we cant really say its 5bb/100 for everyone. Its more like some % of our winnings. I hope someone with bigger sample of his own hands would share.
    • Waiboy
      Waiboy
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.09.2008 Posts: 4,877
      iPoker FL SH $.5/$1 ~ 3.1BB/100 through 80k hands or so (I don't have my stats with me, but it is something in this order).
    • justkyle88
      justkyle88
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 7,596
      Hmmm, Interesting.

      Well I payed $286 over 50k hands on NL10.
      Not sure how to calculate bb/100, care to share?

      Thanks.
    • jonnyquest
      jonnyquest
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.09.2009 Posts: 285
      Originally posted by justkyle88
      Hmmm, Interesting.

      Well I payed $286 over 50k hands on NL10.
      Not sure how to calculate bb/100, care to share?

      Thanks.
      Not sure if this is right but I get 5.72 bb/100 hands. $286 is 2860 bb so 2860/50k hands is 0.0572 bb/hand or 5.72 bb/100.
    • justkyle88
      justkyle88
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 7,596
      wow that seems like I've payed alot then.
      No wonder I was breakeven over 50k hands...
    • JuiceQuadre
      JuiceQuadre
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.10.2008 Posts: 2,688
      Originally posted by jonnyquest
      Originally posted by justkyle88
      Hmmm, Interesting.

      Well I payed $286 over 50k hands on NL10.
      Not sure how to calculate bb/100, care to share?

      Thanks.
      Not sure if this is right but I get 5.72 bb/100 hands. $286 is 2860 bb so 2860/50k hands is 0.0572 bb/hand or 5.72 bb/100.
      Ye this is correct =) Yea as you can see rake can eat a lot of ur winrate.
    • JuiceQuadre
      JuiceQuadre
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.10.2008 Posts: 2,688
      Ok so i installed HEM today so lets see some of mine old hands from ps and everest.

      NL2 - 6729hands. - winrate 15.1bb/100 - rake paid took 9.6bb/100 - ~40%
      NL5 - 13000hands - winrate 16.8bb/100 - rake paid took 8.24bb/100 - ~33%
      NL10 - 34300hands - winrate 10.2bb/100 - rake paid took 8.4bb/100 - ~45%
      NL25 - 17300hands - winrate 8.7bb/100 - rake paid took 7.2bb/100 - ~45%

      Quite interesting =)

      I hope someone from higher limits is gonna share=) )
    • jonnyquest
      jonnyquest
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.09.2009 Posts: 285
      Originally posted by justkyle88
      wow that seems like I've payed alot then.
      No wonder I was breakeven over 50k hands...
      Thanks to rakeback you still end up making about 1.5 bb/100. I'm currently making as much from rakeback then I am through winnings.
    • caltabiano
      caltabiano
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.03.2007 Posts: 1,992
      Originally posted by JuiceQuadre
      Ok so i installed HEM today so lets see some of mine old hands from ps and everest.

      NL2 - 6729hands. - winrate 15.1bb/100 - rake paid took 9.6bb/100 - ~40%
      NL5 - 13000hands - winrate 16.8bb/100 - rake paid took 8.24bb/100 - ~33%
      NL10 - 34300hands - winrate 10.2bb/100 - rake paid took 8.4bb/100 - ~45%
      NL25 - 17300hands - winrate 8.7bb/100 - rake paid took 7.2bb/100 - ~45%

      Quite interesting =)

      I hope someone from higher limits is gonna share=) )
      I think the rake HEM shows is not exactly what YOU paid of rake. Since using the dealt rake method, the rake from each pot is divided between all players. The rake that you actually paid should be smaller I believe. I'm not sure it makes a huge difference though.
      I know CoreySteel will eventually hit this thread and make all calculations for us :tongue: