Hi!
In december I switched to $2/4SH at FT and later played $2/4FR and $3/6FR.
I did not like my results on $2/4SH after 20k hands... -$938 or -1.2BB/100.
As well $3/6FR (12k hands, -$971 or -1.31BB/100
-> lot of bad luck here... bellow 10 AA and KK each, as well hit sets on flop only 1:14)
And in total on 44k hands -0.67BB/100...
Fortunately these these losses were covered by rakeback and some other winnings, but overally I do not like spending 100 hours for nothing

.
My question is: Is there so significant difference between $1/2SH and $2/4SH??
I am able beat $1/2SH at about 3.5-4BB/100 (net, rake excluded), so that means approximatelly 1-1.5BB/100 on FT/Stars, or close to 0BB/100 on sites like Party (where rake is close to 4BB/100 now

, $0.05 per $1 in POT).
I still have feeling that I do not handle swing very well when it comes to $2/4 and where I can overcome $200 on $1/2 quite OK, $400+ on $2/4 or $3/6 makes me quite nervous...
Any hits for further development? (at the moment going through videos on Stoxpoker...)
I decided to switch back to $1/2 and play $2/4 only at bodog (60% rakeback), where games tends to be very soft... but runs very seldom, as well chashed out $400, so my BR is $2k6 now.
Regards
Funktor