This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL5 AQs

    • amplifyd
      Joined: 03.08.2009 Posts: 1,769
      FWIW villian is 59/11 over 20 hands.

      I've been in this spot getting check-raised like 4 times today and I think everytime villian has turned over set (different villians obv) so should I just be giving check-raise credit to a set unless opponent is a maniac type.

      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.02/$0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)

      Known players:

      Preflop: Hero is CO with A, Q.
      UTG2 folds, MP1 calls $0.05, 2 folds, Hero raises to $0.25, BU calls $0.25, SB folds, BB calls $0.20, MP1 folds.

      Flop: ($0.82) 4, 2, Q (3 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $0.60, BU folds, BB raises to $1.20, Hero raises to $4.75, BB calls $3.55.

      Turn: ($10.32) 7 (2 players)

      River: ($10.32) 2 (2 players)

      Final Pot: $10.32.
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510

      I usually give a lot of credit at microstakes if they seem straightforward or just very tight, maybe sometimes too much but it works for me. ~11/9 gets credit, so does ~50/5, ~35/25 doesn't.

      In that particular hand i might call the minraise since 59/11 seems really random and he might bluff sometimes, then reevaluate on the turn depending on his timing and everything. I think folding can be okay too. I wouldn't shove because he doesn't seem to raise too much overall, so i think most of his Qx hands take the check/call line and we'd be shoving against a polarized bluffs(maybe)/monsters range, which is no good.

      Hope it helps.