This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] qa hand review

    • cutegoldfish
      cutegoldfish
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.11.2009 Posts: 4,335
      $0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

      Known players:
      SB = ($1.83)
      BB = ($1.10)
      MP3 = ($2.30)
      CO = ($1.04)
      BU(Hero) = ($2.20)

      Preflop: Hero is BU with Q, A.
      MP3 folds, CO calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.10, 2 folds, CO calls $0.08.

      Flop: ($0.23) 9, 7, 9 (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero bets $0.16, CO calls $0.16.

      Turn: ($0.55) T (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero bets $0.78, CO calls $0.78(All-In).

      River: ($2.11) Q (2 players)


      Final Pot: $2.11.
      Results follow:

      Hero shows two pairs, queens and nines(Q A).
      CO shows three of a kind, nines(A 9).

      CO wins with three of a kind, nines(A 9).


      i thought that the call was to call down a contibet and i could represent a flush draw. i also had 2 over cards. was the size correct? or should i have checked?
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      MaestroOfZerg
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510
      Hi,


      Again, i can't see the suits anywhere so i have no idea what you mean by "representing the flushdraw".

      I'd usually check back that turn because really, trying to bluff players who look like calling stations for just a potsize bet left with bare overcards is a bad idea, they just don't have a fold button.


      Hope it helps.