[NL2-NL10] A6s NL10

    • Renmerb
      Joined: 26.06.2009 Posts: 152
      Basically was an attempted steal, which hits top pair on flop.

      Should I be more aggressive post-flop, I just thought it would be easy for him to hold an over pair like 88.

      Known players:

      0.05/0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.69 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is CO with A:spade: , 6:spade:
      MP3 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, BU calls $0.40, 2 folds.

      Flop: ($0.95) 6:diamond: , 2:club: , 4:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.60, BU calls $0.60.

      Turn: ($2.15) 2:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.30, BU calls $1.30.

      River: ($4.75) 7:spade: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BU bets $3.10, Hero folds.

      Final Pot: $7.85
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510

      Weird. If he was a tag I'd call that river, because they aren't capable of valuebetting one pair hands on the river when the flush gets there on the turn and they would raise a set on the flop, most of them would also raise flushdraws. So i'd put him on some crap that he floated the flop with BUvsCO and picked up a one-card flushdraw on the turn, and take the risk of calling that bet and maybe look dumb if i'm wrong :D

      As it is, he looks more fishy than anything else so he likely plays a flush exactly like that, he could also not have raised a set on the flop and have a boat. Better yet, he could even be merging on the river and "valuebet" something like 88 just because you didn't bet yourself. So i think folding is ok against his $3 bet barring further reads.

      Hope it helps.