This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL 25 99 bad card on the river

    • hov100
      Joined: 24.03.2009 Posts: 57
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.1/$0.25 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

      Known players:
      CO (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is CO with 9, 9.
      MP3 raises to $0.75, Hero calls $0.75, 3 folds.

      Flop: ($1.85) 4, Q, Q (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero bets $1.00, MP3 calls $1.00.

      Turn: ($3.85) 9 (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero bets $2.50, MP3 calls $2.50.

      River: ($8.85) 4 (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero bets $4.00, MP3 raises to $10.00, Hero folds, MP3 gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $12.85.

      MP3 is 34/10/2 on 80 hands
      Is this played okay?
      Should I check the river?
  • 2 replies
    • Anger86
      Joined: 17.08.2008 Posts: 511
      Hi hov100,

      I think, I'm calling a Villain's raise on the R, as played.
      That's because I get 22,85:6 = close to 4:1 odds,
      which is not that bad as he could be sometimes bluffing with Ax
      or even value-raising 4x.

      Here is a little equation: (9h9d vs 4x, Qx, without Ax)
      Equity Win Tie Loss Hand
      Hero : 95.636 % 95.636 % 0.000 % 4.364 % 9h9d
      Villain : 4.364 % 4.364 % 0.000 % 95.636 % Q2s+, 42s+, Q2o+, 42o+

      I like c/c line better on the river as he could bet Ax as a bluff relatively often there
      and if he has a Qx hand, then we keep the pot small. Big hands = big pot, small hands = small pot.
      It also seems like a very small pot for a Qx hand here.
      IMO, opponents mostly would make pot bigger at least on the T with a Qx.
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      I would also valuebet river and likely also call c/r since 4x imo has the same range than Qx and also he would often c/r turn with Qx