[NL2-NL10] NL10 FR - AQo vs 2 opponents

    • altruist
      altruist
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.05.2007 Posts: 121
      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)
      UTG+2:
      $2.35
      MP1:
      $2.36
      MP3:
      $4.37
      CO:
      $4.42
      BU:
      $5.17
      SB:
      $18.11
      BB:
      $5.38
      UTG+1:
      $10.12
      Hero:
      $2.20

      0.05/0.10 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.8 by www.pokerstrategy.cc.

      Preflop: Hero is MP2 with Q:spade: , A:club:
      UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 calls $0.10, MP1 folds, Hero raises to $0.60, 4 folds, BB calls $0.50, UTG+2 calls $0.50.

      Flop: ($1.85) 4:club: , K:diamond: , 4:diamond: (3 players)
      BB bets $0.10, UTG+2 raises to $1.75 (All-In), Hero folds, BB calls $1.65.

      Turn: ($5.35) 6:heart:
      River: ($5.35) Q:heart:


      Final Pot: $5.35
  • 8 replies
    • Chiller3k
      Chiller3k
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2007 Posts: 4,326
      Normal raise size would be 50cent
      elsewise played right
    • Berliner1982
      Berliner1982
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.07.2006 Posts: 5,644
      Allways raise 4 times BB + 1 BB for every limper. Only exception should be the SB where you raise 5 times BB + 1 limper (unless you´re first In), because you play postflop OOP and have an easier decision with a bigger pot.
    • altruist
      altruist
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.05.2007 Posts: 121
      I think I had a limper behind me on this hand (someone posted BB) which was why I raised 60c
    • Berliner1982
      Berliner1982
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.07.2006 Posts: 5,644
      Ok iThat would be should by Texas Grambem in this hand. But if thats the case, ok, then $0.60 was right. :)
    • Chiller3k
      Chiller3k
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2007 Posts: 4,326
      Originally posted by Berliner1982
      Ok iThat would be should by Texas Grambem in this hand. But if thats the case, ok, then $0.60 was right. :)
      Is it? I thought 4BB + 1BB/ Limper in front of you
      Blind posters don't care
      That's what the german Strategy says.
    • aciddrop
      aciddrop
      Bronze
      Joined: 08.10.2006 Posts: 1,519
      I always charge 1 for the blind posters behind me. Let the callers make an even bigger mistake. I didn't get that from the strategy, I just adopted that for myself. :)
    • altruist
      altruist
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.05.2007 Posts: 121
      Yeah, I personally add the 1 BB to give the callers worse pot odds. Should the blind poster call, the blinds behind him may get enough odds to call with almost anything.
    • Berliner1982
      Berliner1982
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.07.2006 Posts: 5,644
      For me I care for Blind Posters because otherwise my opponents might get good pot Odds.

      Lets assume their are 2 Limpers + 1 Blind Poster behind me + the Blinds. With $0.50/$1 Blinds are $4.5 in the Pot.

      So if I only raise to 6 BB here the pot will be $10.50 and the Blind Poster is getting 2:1 immediatly. So if he put us on two Overcards he often has an Equity of more the 33% what he needs to call profitable with. With a Pocket he often has a coinflip, so he can call profitable. And every other player behind is getting even better odds to call then.

      If we raise to 7 BB, he has to bring $6 into a $11.50. It might only make a slightly difference, but against you as a Shorty is implied Odds are even worse now. And for you, you have an easier decision postflop, since the pot would be so big.