This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Kq Bu

    • Jeffers16
      Joined: 03.09.2008 Posts: 304
      Known players:

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.69 by

      Preflop: Hero is BU with Q:spade: , K:club:
      MP3 raises to $0.07, CO folds, Hero calls $0.07, 2 folds.

      Flop: ($0.17) Q:club: , 5:spade: , 6:heart: (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero bets $0.10, MP3 raises to $0.31, Hero calls $0.21.

      Turn: ($0.79) 2:diamond: (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero checks.

      River: ($0.79) 9:diamond: (2 players)
      MP3 bets $0.79, Hero calls $0.79.

      Final Pot: $2.37

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      Hero shows a pair of queens (Qs Kc)
      MP3 shows a pair of threes (3h 3c)

      Hero wins with a pair of queens (Qs Kc)

      I checked behind on the turn to try and get him to bet the river with worse hands. And he did such a big bet on the river that I felt most of the time it will be a bluff.

      Would there be an arguement for betting the turn for more value? Or raising the river?

      My reasoning for just calling on the river was that no hand that I beat would call, the only hands that would call would be a set or straight.

  • 1 reply
    • caltabiano
      Joined: 09.03.2007 Posts: 1,992
      As played, river is just a call.

      BUT, we should definitely bet the turn. We have value against worse Q's, 78, 67, 77, 88, 99.

      People will be calling REALLY loose in NL2. The key for beating this limit is to value bet, value bet, value bet.

      I'd bet flop, turn and river here :evil: