-
22.07.2010, 15:56
-
0
-
This post has been edited 1 time(s), it was last edited by blackops888: 22.07.2010 16:02.
Hey Gugi19. In the lack of any further information about the opponent (both for the way RUSH poker works and for the reason that maybe you have never seen him playing before), it is quite hard to know where you stand in this hand, but some things could have been done.
Maybe once he was on SB against a raise and a cold-call, he could eventually just call AQ or AT in case he was a passive player. In the same way, he could also have just called pocket 5s, hitting a set on the flop. I've seen tons of passive players on NL10 who just call whatever they have when facing apparently strong opposition (raise and cold-call in this spot when out of position), raising only in case they've got TT+ or AK. So... that's possibilitity 1 (we have to speculate once he is just an unknown).
Possibility number 2 supports that he could have just called because he actually had marginal holdings such as QT (hitting two pair) and weak Tx/Qx (hitting one pair only with mediocre kicker). I would not put him on a flush (two clubs on the hole) or straight draw (KJ or 98) right on the spot because at this limit people still tend to play their flush and straight draws very passively. Instead of donking, they usually hope to get a free card just by check/calling small bets.
In both situations (number 1, when you are already crushed, and number 2, when you are still ahead) you should have used your position and raised the flop right on the spot. This could have made him fold weaker holdings such as Tx/Qx right there. A raise to 2.00 on his bet of 0.70 would have been fine.
In case he had a draw, he would be contributing with 1.30 more for a pot of 5.15, which is about 25% total. He could actually pay this amount, but that would have been a mistake given the bad odds YOU WERE PRESENTING to his flush draw. It is important to understand the idea of how you can control the odds you opponent is getting when facing him heads-up and in position.
In case he actually had you crushed with 55, AQ or AT, that ace on the turn would make him either bet big on you or try to trap and just check. If he bets big, you can then easily fold, given the resistance he offers and the presence of an overcard. If he checks, you can make a small bet such as half-pot and see what happens. He could then raise you or just call and finally check again on the river. In this case you check back. If he bets big on the river, you fold, given his resistance, the A on the turn and the flush card.
It's a very speculative analysis, once we have no clue about who this player might be or what kind of line he could take. All we can do is probe his play RIGHT ON THE FLOP with a raise, instead of just calling like you did in this hand. What happened from then on would define the hand.
Got it? Also, by raising 2.00 on the flop and being beaten on the turn would have avoided the loss of 2.30 that you ended up having in this hand after the flop. That's a 0.30 spare and might have given you a clue of weather you were actually beaten or not.