[NL2-NL10] NL10 SH - Overpair OOP

    • StaticMoth
      Joined: 22.05.2009 Posts: 2,642
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:
      CO (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q, Q.
      2 folds, Hero raises to $0.35, BU raises to $1.20, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.85.

      Flop: ($2.55) 6, T, J (2 players)
      Hero checks, BU bets $1.80, Hero calls $1.80.

      Turn: ($6.15) 4 (2 players)
      Hero checks, BU checks.

      River: ($6.15) 4 (2 players)
      Hero bets $2.40, BU raises to $7.64, Hero folds, BU gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $8.55.

      Don't know why I decided to just call the 3bet OOP, but I did ... Took a weird line and paid the price :f_biggrin:
      Don't use HUD, but stats show 21/10/3.3AF/7,7% 3bet (most of that from BU & BB) over 91 hands.

      Got really confused by this one ...
      If he had a real hand, why wouldn't he continue valuebetting on the turn and to protect in case I have a FD or smth?

      River FD missed, so would he do this w/ AJ? or KK?

      The turn check behind is really confusing the hell out of me :f_biggrin:

      Perhaps he had a missed FD w/ smth like AQ/AKs, thus the turn check and river bluff raise due to my smallish bet?
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      since you´re littlebit deeper I´d likely play the same way pf. but you have always option 4-bet to 3$ and call shove
      I think c/c is reasonable, you can also c/r flop and play for stacks, since if he is aggressive I think he won´t get away there AJ or any Jx hand and he can play his draws aggressively
      Unlikely that he has there 4x, so I´d b/c river. I think AK/AQ has enough in his range that he turns into bluff