[NL2-NL10] NL2 - AQs TPTK

    • DannyG13
      DannyG13
      Bronze
      Joined: 28.10.2009 Posts: 1,150
      No reads. I thought he was c/r a lot of JQ/KQ type hands, as well as sometimes taking this line with a flush draw. Once I 3bet on the flop, I had to call his raise right?

      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (7 handed)

      Known players:
      CO (Hero):
      $2.15
      BU:
      $2.71
      SB:
      $2.07
      BB:
      $1.39
      MP1:
      $1.06
      MP2:
      $2.98
      MP3:
      $2.73


      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q, A.
      3 folds, Hero raises to $0.08, BU folds, SB calls $0.07, BB folds.

      Flop: ($0.18) 4, 7, Q (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.10, SB raises to $0.34, Hero raises to $1.00, SB raises to $1.66, Hero raises to $2.17, SB calls $0.33.

      Turn: ($4.24) Q (2 players)


      River: ($4.24) 8 (2 players)


      Final Pot: $4.24.

      Results follow:

      SB shows three of a kind, queens(Qd Kc).
      Hero shows three of a kind, queens(Qc Ac).

      Hero wins with three of a kind, queens(Qc Ac).
  • 2 replies
    • minihulk22
      minihulk22
      Global
      Joined: 05.09.2009 Posts: 140
      His 3 betting , 5 betting and than finally calls what he have left from his stack . In a big percentage of this cases you'll be up against set . Again +reads
    • Duudalinja
      Duudalinja
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.12.2009 Posts: 1,030
      Howdy,

      If we have no idea how loose/aggro he is, making assumptions about his capability to raise with worse hands is debatable. If there's any chance he's just an usual fish - playing for stacks is fine as he may have worse Qx/draws. Against nitty/passive players I tend to see sets/combo draws too often against which you are far from being favourite, but I assume there will be enough bad players out there to justify times when this unknown turns out to be passive nit.

      Good luck!