This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL2 - AQs TPTK

    • DannyG13
      Joined: 28.10.2009 Posts: 1,160
      No reads. I thought he was c/r a lot of JQ/KQ type hands, as well as sometimes taking this line with a flush draw. Once I 3bet on the flop, I had to call his raise right?

      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (7 handed)

      Known players:
      CO (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q, A.
      3 folds, Hero raises to $0.08, BU folds, SB calls $0.07, BB folds.

      Flop: ($0.18) 4, 7, Q (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.10, SB raises to $0.34, Hero raises to $1.00, SB raises to $1.66, Hero raises to $2.17, SB calls $0.33.

      Turn: ($4.24) Q (2 players)

      River: ($4.24) 8 (2 players)

      Final Pot: $4.24.

      Results follow:

      SB shows three of a kind, queens(Qd Kc).
      Hero shows three of a kind, queens(Qc Ac).

      Hero wins with three of a kind, queens(Qc Ac).
  • 2 replies
    • minihulk22
      Joined: 05.09.2009 Posts: 140
      His 3 betting , 5 betting and than finally calls what he have left from his stack . In a big percentage of this cases you'll be up against set . Again +reads
    • Duudalinja
      Joined: 21.12.2009 Posts: 1,030

      If we have no idea how loose/aggro he is, making assumptions about his capability to raise with worse hands is debatable. If there's any chance he's just an usual fish - playing for stacks is fine as he may have worse Qx/draws. Against nitty/passive players I tend to see sets/combo draws too often against which you are far from being favourite, but I assume there will be enough bad players out there to justify times when this unknown turns out to be passive nit.

      Good luck!