[NL2-NL10] NL 10 44, high-paired board against TAG

    • Pichux
      Pichux
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2009 Posts: 318
      ***** Hand History for Game 2398717063 ***** (IPoker)
      $10.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, August 20, 05:14:34 ET 2010
      Table Fehok (Real Money)
      Seat 5 is the button
      Seat 3: diskflash1 ( $14.34 USD )
      Seat 5: Piters1990 ( $10.71 USD )
      Seat 6: johnny1144 ( $3.32 USD )
      Seat 8: shikakanoid ( $13.18 USD )
      Seat 10: mayryk ( $10.42 USD )
      johnny1144 posts small blind [$0.05 USD].
      shikakanoid posts big blind [$0.10 USD].
      ** Dealing down cards **
      Dealt to Piters1990 [ 4 :diamond: 4 :heart: ]
      mayryk folds
      diskflash1 raises [$0.40 USD]
      Piters1990 calls [$0.40 USD]
      johnny1144 folds
      shikakanoid folds
      ** Dealing Flop ** [ K :heart: , 3 :diamond: , K :club: ]
      diskflash1 bets [$0.60 USD]
      Piters1990 calls [$0.60 USD]
      ** Dealing Turn ** [ 2 :spade: ]
      diskflash1 bets [$1.40 USD]
      Piters1990 calls [$1.40 USD]
      ** Dealing River ** [ 7 :heart: ]
      diskflash1 checks
      Piters1990 checks

      Villain: 24/18/2.8 on 108h big sample

      I think that 3-bet on the flop could also be an option, but the reg could translate it as weakness and an attempt to steal the pot, so i just called. The turn didn't changed anything much, and his bet was less than 2/3 so i just kept to call. When he checks on the river i really feel myself ahead, but a bet would be a mistake, because he can still have some higher PP.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Kaitz20
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      I think I like calldown with QQ and AA, but not 44, since even if he is bluffing with 56 he has still enough outs to improve his hand, so instead of turn your hand into bluff catcher I think raising flop is better