This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL 25 FR, 99 set on F, FH on T

    • oedipa
      oedipa
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.07.2009 Posts: 127
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.1/$0.25 No-Limit Hold'em (7 handed)

      Known players:
      MP3:
      $19.97
      CO (Hero):
      $25.00
      BU:
      $25.00
      SB:
      $27.21
      BB:
      $10.00
      MP1:
      $8.10
      MP2:
      $11.15


      Preflop: Hero is CO with 9, 9.
      2 folds, MP3 calls $0.25, Hero raises to $0.75, 3 folds, MP3 calls $0.50.

      Flop: ($1.85) 3, 9, J (2 players)
      MP3 bets $1.00, Hero raises to $3.00, MP3 calls $2.00.

      Turn: ($7.85) J (2 players)
      MP3 bets $7.00, Hero calls $7.00.

      River: ($21.85) J (2 players)
      MP3 bets $9.22, Hero calls $9.22.

      Final Pot: $40.29.

      Here is my question in general and can be applied to this example
      If villain bets potsize on turn and will have only a half of the pot on river, is it better to just shove on turn when hero has the nuts? is there a situation when it is better for hero to just call in position and then call a river all in or shove river himself?

      edit: villain is a fish. Don't mind the raise size preflop, it was a missclick, I usually raise potsize.
      In this example villain could have J, some random pairs and flushdraws, shold I shove over his bet or let him bluff on river? I know he is commited on turn but does he know it?
      thank you for advice :)
  • 2 replies