[NL2-NL10] NL10 AQ vs LAG

    • N0pr3s3n7
      N0pr3s3n7
      Coach
      Coach
      Joined: 14.05.2009 Posts: 1,274
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (4 handed)

      Known players:
      BB:
      $11.69
      CO:
      $10.49
      BU:
      $11.72
      SB (Hero):
      $10.00


      Preflop: Hero is SB with A, Q.
      CO calls $0.10, BU calls $0.10, Hero raises to $0.40, BB folds, CO calls $0.30, BU calls $0.30.

      Flop: ($1.3) 6, Q, 4 (3 players)
      Hero bets $0.95, CO calls $0.95, BU folds.

      Turn: ($3.2) 6 (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.95, CO folds, Hero gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $3.2.


      villian is:
      61/20/73 vpip/pfr/hands
      bet turn in position: 0
      fold to cbet flop: 70%, fold to cbet turn: 67%
      aggression freq. on turn: 48% (flop: 30, river: 32)
      agrf: 5

      I don't think i'm ever bet/folding here so it's either check/call , check/raise or bet/call.What do you think is the best line here ?
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      MaestroOfZerg
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510
      Hi,


      Well he's just a fish in the end so I don't really see why we can't bet/fold there, it's not like we can give him credit for trying to represent the flush or anything. If he raises that turn he very likely has the flush or 6x and we're doing pretty bad out of position unless you can take flushdraws out of his range when he doesn't raise the flop, which you probably can't.

      I'd rather just valuebet for the times he has a worse Qx hand that he will call 3 bets with and lay down my hand to a raise than either miss out on a valuebet or go broke in a spot where we're doing bad until he proves he can bluff-raise there or play another Qx like that.


      Hope it helps.