This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL10 KK rivered

    • Pichux
      Joined: 02.02.2009 Posts: 318
      ***** Hand History for Game 2436685779 ***** (IPoker)
      $10.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, September 19, 10:31:22 ET 2010
      Table Gozal (Real Money)
      Seat 3 is the button
      Seat 1: Piters1990 ( $10.00 USD )
      Seat 3: echinaceea ( $10.52 USD )
      Seat 5: blackcoffee666 ( $10.05 USD )
      Seat 6: Lennox110 ( $17.48 USD )
      Seat 8: exshark ( $20.26 USD )
      Seat 10: Avals11 ( $3.23 USD )
      blackcoffee666 posts small blind [$0.05 USD].
      Lennox110 posts big blind [$0.10 USD].
      ** Dealing down cards **
      Dealt to Piters1990 [ K :spade: K :club: ]
      exshark folds
      Avals11 folds
      Piters1990 raises [$0.35 USD]
      echinaceea folds
      blackcoffee666 folds
      Lennox110 calls [$0.25 USD]
      ** Dealing Flop ** [ 3 :diamond: , 7 :heart: , 9 :spade: ]
      Lennox110 checks
      Piters1990 bets [$0.56 USD]
      Lennox110 calls [$0.56 USD]
      ** Dealing Turn ** [ 4 :spade: ]
      Lennox110 checks
      Piters1990 bets [$1.30 USD]
      Lennox110 calls [$1.30 USD]
      ** Dealing River ** [ 2 :club: ]
      Lennox110 bets [$4.47 USD]
      Piters1990 raises [$7.79 USD]

      Villain: 68/7/0.9 fish on small sample

      Should i really let go here? Actualy just now looking at the hand, i understood that i should've let go, because there are quite some hands that could be played this way. Sets, straights. Is he doing this with weaker hands? If the fold option here is right, then i guess its the same thing if we have aces here, right?
  • 1 reply
    • MaestroOfZerg
      Joined: 17.11.2008 Posts: 5,510

      All one pair hands have the same relative value yes, they're bluff-catchers mostly, which means first and foremost that shoving isn't really an option. If we're beat we're just losing more money, if he's bluff he won't call the raise. If you believe villain could be thinking he slowplayed TT-QQ there this is more complicated and you usually have to call, but it's a long shot.

      Now it is possible that villain whiffed something like T8/JT and felt like bluffing there even tho he looks kinda passive overall. Problem is he could have any and all two pairs/straights on that board he is clearly loose enough for that, he could also have slowplayed a set or something since the begining. Usually I won't make that call on that board unless I've seen villain not valuebetting two pairs before, in which case his range might be polarized enough for us to bluff-catch.

      Hope it helps.