Casino at the Empire, Leicester Square

  • 4 replies
    • ZeMammuth
      ZeMammuth
      Bronze
      Joined: 08.11.2008 Posts: 704
      I've pld there a few times, Won quite abit actually people seem generally weak, my roll is abit low to play it on a reg basis though, so I don't go too often, I play at the grosvenor aswell.
    • antonio47211
      antonio47211
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.04.2009 Posts: 129
      • 15.10.2010, 23:24
      • This post has been edited 1 time(s), it was last edited by antonio47211: 15.10.2010 23:24.
      Have played a few times too, mixed feelings - sometimes its ridiculously weak, some times its so weak it becomes strong (wtf is 5 ppls limping, I raise to 15 bb from BU, and ALL of them including sb / bb call? :f_eek: ).

      Have no notes though, so we can have just a general chat about things. Would love!
    • JonikoP
      JonikoP
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.05.2010 Posts: 600
      I know what you mean about the incredibly loose play - profitable in the long run but increases variance in the short term. Especially when playing on a short bankroll and it takes longer to get to the long run live.

      I've played a couple of the tournaments recently - the structure is pretty poor but there is so much dead money I think they are going to be profitable.

      How does the Vic compare Ze Mammuth?
    • ZeMammuth
      ZeMammuth
      Bronze
      Joined: 08.11.2008 Posts: 704
      Vic is just as bad, basic abc poker crushes these games easy, you don't need to level things out, the players aren't observant. If you've been playing tight, they won't even notice and give you respect when you raise, they will still pay you off.

      This is what from what i've noticed on nl100 and 200, haven't pld above it yet. But i've seen a few players play at higher stake and still seems very fishy, many mistakes made.