This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH 33 preflop 3 bet

    • SPeedFANat1c
      SPeedFANat1c
      Bronze
      Joined: 04.01.2009 Posts: 5,150
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.04(BB) Replayer
      SB ($3.61)
      Hero ($6.02)
      UTG ($4.68)
      UTG+1 ($4.04)
      CO ($5.85)
      BTN ($3.45)

      Dealt to Hero 3:club: 3:heart:

      UTG calls $0.04, UTG+1 checks, CO calls $0.04, BTN raises to $0.24, fold, Hero raises to $0.84, fold, fold, CO calls $0.80, fold

      FLOP ($2.02) 9:spade: T:club: 2:spade:

      Hero bets $1.28, CO calls $1.28

      TURN ($4.58) 9:spade: T:club: 2:spade: 8:club:

      Hero checks, CO bets $2.28, Hero folds

      CO wins $4.48

      CO is 69/9/1.5
      BTN is 24/24/5 after 34 hands

      I didn't pay much attention to CO because he only limped. Agaisnt BTN probably it is ok to raise because we generate fold equity. But then the fich called. And I didn't call PF because I hadn't good implied odds against BTN. So how do you think was it ok to 3bet here?

      I cbet flop because at that moment I thought that 24/24/5 guy called me, so I wanted to bluff him.
      Against CO I should check/fold here.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Kaitz20
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      I think call pf is a little better.
      utg or co would very often call and if you hit your set you can easily stack fishes.
      And it isn´t really the easiest way play 33 oop even with initiative since you very often c-bet once and then have to give up.
      I think on that board c-bet is fine, although I´d likely just c/f
      This hits quite hard their calling range and I think you don´t ahve enough fold equity or overall equity with 33