{"id":39877,"date":"2022-11-18T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-18T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/pl\/pokerowe-bledy-ktore-popelnialismy-kiedys-set-mining\/"},"modified":"2026-03-03T18:05:38","modified_gmt":"2026-03-03T18:05:38","slug":"pokerowe-bledy-ktore-popelnialismy-kiedys-set-mining","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/pl\/news\/content\/Pokerowe-b%C5%82%C4%99dy-kt%C3%B3re-pope%C5%82niali%C5%9Bmy-kiedy%C5%9B-set-mining_124667\/","title":{"rendered":"Pokerowe b\u0142\u0119dy, kt\u00f3re pope\u0142niali\u015bmy kiedy\u015b - set mining"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n
\n<\/p>

\n

Jakiś czas temu pisałem o tym, jak solvery GTO pokazały nam błędy naszego myślenia na temat pokera. Zacząłem od zbytniego martwienia się dominacją<\/a>, a dziś chcę poruszyć inny ważny temat - jak naprawdę przecenialiśmy set mining.<\/p>\n

\n
Things elite poker players used to believe (pre solvers)
1. Worried far more about domination than they should have
2. Overrated set mining
3. Blockers weren’t a thing in NLH (only PLO)
4. Backdoors didn’t matter much
5. Limping always terrible (especially from small blind) pic.twitter.com\/KqYh8pBtva<\/a><\/p>\n
— Dara O'Kearney (@daraokearney) September 28, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n