NL 10 zoom deep top set

pretty sick.

seems like he just won't stack off with less than AK:s but i'd probably still do it anyway... i mean that's 1 combo and we have "some equity"
hope for A:s A, K:s K or something

Hello Tsukk,

Doubt that it's easy to get away here whilst the guy could easily even have worse sets and not to talk about maybe even A:sA or whatsoever as Tomaloc mentioned. Even if he has flush we will still have decent equity against that hand.

Although I wouldn't be shoving directly there but instead make a normal raise to force him make mistakes.

Best Regards.

Hello and thanks, just one question comes in my mind.

Do worse sets, or A:sA really goes for check/minraise here? Why he wouldnt go cbet/shove with them?:)

yeah, that's the problem.

it's like FUUUUUU toppest of my range and he only reps 1 combo wtfshipthemonies.
just can't play it more passively, even though he just does ALWAYS have it there

Seems so wrong, to ship it vs 1 combo while he always has it.

Whats the point in it then?

because he's unknown, and when you're losing against only 1 combo you also only need 1 combo of hands that you beat to make it profitable.
between all the A:s A K:s K or maaaaybe (by a long shot) even TT there's enough of possibility that he could have one of those while you still have a so small sample on him.

also here it's not like you may be drawing for only one out... so all things considered it's a cry ship

Originally posted by Tsukk
Hello and thanks, just one question comes in my mind.

Do worse sets, or A:sA really goes for check/minraise here? Why he wouldnt go cbet/shove with them?:)

Well, neither you can't discard TT combos or maybe even 55 combos which play that horrible. Instead I'd rather discard AA combo cause of his raise size preflop. But most likely I would end up still going broke here cause even if we are vs flush we have still decent equity vs it.