Ryusei is right !
If we do more detailed analytics - we gain the better level of understanding situations.
So it would be awesome if you will make analytic coachings like at the end of yesterday's, Unam.
Hi,
no, we changed the starting times and it took the serveres some time to refresh.
The coaching is in the plan now and it will start at 22:15.
CU
Thanks a lot for review on the last caching, Unam!
I did not imagine how hard is to talk English for me =( I did not speak English for a while and I was very nervous when I could not remember the exact word, my minds where confused all the time (I am much better when I am typing
) - but we are not looking for the simple ways!
So I was very glad when you helped to put my speech in the right way in the moments where I trapped myself
Now I know that I should improve my verbal English too
By the way, my voice was way very behind so sorry for interrupting you all the time ![]()
I made some notes - so I think I'll generate at least some questions
Hope to be reviewed once more some day! I always ready to send my HH if there is nobody going to do it for the one of the next review coachings! And if it would be more useful - I could send the stats for the players too (I use filters, but I can send even filtered stats too)
Hi all,
Jay will do the coaching tomorrow, but because of that the coaching will start at 18:30 this tomorrow.
Thanks to Jay.
And CU all next week.
Hey!
Just wanted to say that yesterday's coaching was very cool! Analytics was hard but very useful and now I know that I can add another tool to my gaming arsenal + now we have better understanding in stop and go ranges from both sides of situation (cause I personally was very confused when someone used this move against me).
And do not worry about coaching interestingness, Unam! Those who left the coaching don't realize how important it is for their own skill and game development. Theory and analytic are basic things in our game understanding! And those who don't realize that will always tell - "Theory sucks! Let's see how you play on 4 tables..."- they refuse to get such valuable information.
And frankly saying I'm glad that a small number of people really want to gain such useful knowledge. The fewer people now - the better roi we will have =).
So I hope theory coachings will be held in future at least once a month or two months! Or more often
Hello!
I have some small questions about stop&go (hope it's not to late ♦ ).
I understand that it is better to make a push in situations which are written here but anyway I want to view them from the stop&go angle - to confuse and to put opponents (esp regs) into hard situations.
First of all - we were thinking about the bubble situations last coaching. So I am curios - what if we have 6 max situation in some middle stages (like 50/100 blinds) with ~8-10 blinds? It is obvious that our range can be wider vs some 15-20 blinds stack, because we usually will be called with some hands with at least middle pairs (if opp is a reg) or with a hands better than A-high , I guess, and wider from phony fishes.
The question is - should we be tight against chip-leader (40 bbs for example)?
Or we can stop&go him with wide range too, also pretending that we are playing our top range?
And the same situation (we have 8-11) with 2 opps (with stacks like 17-22 bbs - MP2 and BU for example). How wide can we be on dry boards like J72r which are very nasty for calling small pairs and A-high hands. Or it is not profitable at all to stop&go against 2 players (even if we know that both of them could be wide pre)?
Thanks Unam for the coaching, as always like the perspective and eye openers !
Great job!
Thanks Unam for the coaching last thursday, was a nice one!
Here are some topic suggestions for the working session next week, as you wanted us to give (and tbh the Gigabet-topic really sounds a bit lame :P):
-Oddspushes/Oddscalls
- -EV-Pushes/Calls
- Raising vs POF in the late phase
- Postflopplay (when or not to cbet, donkbet vs check-call/raise/fold, when to make thin valuebets, good spots to bluff, differences in postflopplay between early and middle phase...) imho this topic is well underrated, especially when it comes to sng-players.
- Spots to loosen up for nitty TAG-players (loose blindsteals, light 3bets, etc.)
Maybe one of these topics sounds appealing to you, would be very interesting, at least for me ♦
Thanks for the feedback!!!
And thanks for your suggestions, I will pick one of the topics.
I don't know which one, but I will announce it before the coaching.
Hi,
we will work on board structures, when to cbet, why and how.
Hope you help me with your input and ideas.
Hi,
Thank you for the coaching Unam, great as always.
I have a request for one of the next possible coachings.
I usually play both turbo and non-turbo 6max SnG, between the 22-100 euro stakes.
However I often come across situations on which I act different according on which of the 2 structures i am playing on, i.e. I would fold on a marginally plus EV spot on a non turbo knowing that I will be able to find for sure better spots in the future, specially if I am playing against fish, which is very often the case, whereas in the turbo I would always push on the same spot.
Therefore I think it would be really interesting for everybody that plays both formats to see how do your ranges behave according to this factor.
As far as I know this has not been done yet and I think it is a very important thing to consider.
Thanks,
Pedro.