€22 Qq

From this and the previous post I notice you think on a 'street by street' level.
This gets you into some spots where you have very tough decisions because of the stacksizes , while if you would have planned the hand differently , you would have a 'clear' spot

On this hand: I'd isolate bigger to atleast 4 bb.
Its tough to plan the hand on the F because i have no dynamics or limpcall ranges and stuff , but in general , I would bet F and T and then because he is a loosepassive bet the R.
But again b-f is such a shame because of stacksizes.

ch-c is an option vs a aggro villain

general remark: the betline you took now screams to me you have QQ-TT, sometimes 66-88.
Kx you would bet bigger to protect , same with sets , and Fd you would bet bigger to get FE

If we would have isolated to 4bb:

F: 320
cbet 240

T: 800
shove T

-> this way you max your value vs fd , PP , ...
-> this renders villain unable to read you , your range might be Kx , fd , PP, but he can only guess what exactly is in your range.

Yeah i know i play my hand face up this way, But i dont think we need to balance against fish who does not think on that level anyway.

Originally posted by raise2much
Yeah i know i play my hand face up this way, But i dont think we need to balance against fish who does not think on that level anyway.

very good remark !
Thats also why it was only the second reason