EDIT: lol why was I thinking this was BTN vs CO??? I will leave it here just note that I missread positions. Now that I realized it is BB vs CO I like Internets ranges, maybe would ditch 99 from 3bet range, only 3bet bluff suited hands and not call as wide cause I am not such a boss postflop
feel free to comment though if you see mistakes in my logic even though its about different positions
================================================
my understanding is that we should:
- 3b wider for value if villains opening range is wider (so for example a value 3bet vs BTN 50% open should be wider than that vs 25-30% CO open)
- 3b wider for value if villain is more likely to call than to 4bet (so again blinds vs BTN where we expect more calls because villain is IP as opposed to BTN vs CO)
Now I am 3betting and stacking off AQ,TT blinds vs BTN, I am using the same SO range BTN vs CO but i wonder if it would make more sense polarizing more and only 3bet AK/JJ for value + add some small pairs to use as a 5bet bluff there (their equity is the same as 99 there basically). What do you guys think?
blinds vs BTN I also add value hands to my 3b range that I am not planning on stacking off pf like AJs/KQ
again BTN vs CO where I expect much fewer calls I like to be more polarized and call with these hands rather than 3bet them (this will of course change if villain defends a lot by calling even OOP - but I need to have that read)
