My suggestion is that Damian Copeland pays back at least an equal part in % to all stakers. The fact that my investment in him was the biggest among all stakers shouldn't mean that he pays me less. If anything, it should mean that he pays more since I trusted him more, commited more, sent more money and he abused my trust in the process, so that I kept sending, which I wouldn't do if he provided exact reports and data.
I suggest that Damian pays back at least 50% to all stakers (obviously, he can agree to pay more than 50% to some of the stakers). Initially I proposed 10000EUR, which was my estimate at the time (on 22 May 2013, in private skype chat with Damian). The reason why I now think 50% (which equals to 10602.5 EUR) is the lowest fair amount to be paid, is because I added into account: the tourneys which he played on PokerStars out of agreement (not mentioned so far), the rakeback he got (not mentioned so far) and other factors that are somewhat subjective but should in my opinion be taken into account as well, i.e.: time lost, stress caused etc.
I think 50% is a neutral amount to pay back, which will both ensure all stakers can get at least an equal share back and regain Damian his reputation in the community. I don't think lower percentages can do that.
@Damian: I think you can agree that I have been fair to you so far. I was available in chat, I gave you a lot of strategy and mental game advice , poker material (books, video series), we discussed whatever other topic outside poker too. I visited you in Birmingham, slept at your place, we played live poker together, ate together, had a good time.
I think you can agree that it's fair and expected on your part to show respect towards me and after all what happened, pay back at least 50% of the money I sent you. I don't mind if you pay it over a longer period of time, but please accept your part of responsibility.