NL10 SH, facing 4bet shove w/ QQ

Hand discussions for No Limit

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 13 years ago

4 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

154 Views

RSS

dienaszaglis

Joined: 12.06.2008

Posts: 999

19.06.2013, 11:03 0

$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($12.64) 126bb
UTG+1 ($12.74) 127bb
HERO (CO) ($10) 100bb
BTN ($3.35) 34bb
SB ($11.58) 116bb
BB ($12.52) 125bb

Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) HERO is CO Q♦ Q♥
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $0.30, HERO raises to $0.90, 3 folds, UTG+1 goes all-in $12.74, HERO?

Villain is 40/10, 11h
I don`t think villain is 4bet shoving AA/KK too often, so I guess I have to call.
What if he 4bets to 2.3$? Stacking off/folding gets pretty close.

(/) (°,,,°) (/)

Quote

3 replies

_Anonymous_

19.06.2013, 11:15 0

Hello,

I think stacking off here will be fine.

If he 4bets around $2.3 I would go broke as well.

Best,
Plamen

Quote

dienaszaglis

Joined: 12.06.2008

Posts: 999

19.06.2013, 11:19 0

Hi!

Just to clarify: is it a default play to stack off 100bb CO vs MP with QQ/AK vs unknown?
MP vs UTG is a fold?

(/) (°,,,°) (/)

Quote

_Anonymous_

19.06.2013, 12:00 0

Originally posted by dienaszaglis
Hi!

Just to clarify: is it a default play to stack off 100bb CO vs MP with QQ/AK vs unknown?
MP vs UTG is a fold?

On normal tables I would usually go broke with QQ/AK most of the times until I find a reason not to.

MP/UTG is a little bit closer, but still considering that we have fold equity, plus people are usually going to stack of with at least QQ+, AK themselves, it can't really be a bad move.

Quote