[Closed] Not standart AK again

Posting in a separate thread..

What's with the 8BB raise? (6+1 per limper is kinda excessive, even OOP).
Im more inclined to call the SS down in the second hand than to play for stacks in a 3 way pot in the first one.

Originally posted by darkonebg
What's with the 8BB raise? (6+1 per limper is kinda excessive, even OOP).
Im more inclined to call the SS down in the second hand than to play for stacks in a 3 way pot in the first one.

That's pointless post from you, how should I play 1st hand?

Well its not pointless at all.
You have no idea where are you at after he min3bets you on the turn.
Either call him down or b/f.

Originally posted by darkonebg
Well its not pointless at all.
You have no idea where are you at after he min3bets you on the turn.
Either call him down or b/f.

Lol I don't know? I know he checked flop on a 7c8c board and then minbet turn into 2, of course he is weak, and after his 3bet I just out him on a weak ace, easy.

From his stats he looks bad enough to have any kind of two pair,the straight or a set that he thought cool to slowplay on the flop.
I dont think he's min3betting a weaker ace or a draw here,as his min3bet looks commiting and is clearly for value.Actually it gives another perspective to his smallish initial turnbet, as if he has a monster and is afraid to lose the opposition.
OFC you can just trust your reads and shove there, but posting a hand for evaluation usually means that you want other people's oppinions.

Originally posted by darkonebg
From his stats he looks bad enough to have any kind of two pair,the straight or a set that he thought cool to slowplay on the flop.
I dont think he's min3betting a weaker ace or a draw here,as his min3bet looks commiting and is clearly for value.Actually it gives another perspective to his smallish initial turnbet, as if he has a monster and is afraid to lose the opposition.
OFC you can just trust your reads and shove there, but posting a hand for evaluation usually means that you want other people's oppinions.

Yes I do and I am thankful for your analysis, it's just truth comes from arguening... If he is fishy enough to slowplay a set on that board then why would he think of a commintment raise or something.

ok the sample size is small but the WTS and W$SD and AF indicate that you should fold to his reraise on the turn . basically after he reraises you on the turn you should fold . he almost never has Ax with that play and those stats. just my thoughts.

Originally posted by spit22
ok the sample size is small but the WTS and W$SD and AF indicate that you should fold to his reraise on the turn . basically after he reraises you on the turn you should fold . he almost never has Ax with that play and those stats. just my thoughts.

Lol the sample size is so low that your analysis is biased to statistics only in small % of the cases.

Originally posted by Solomaextra

Originally posted by spit22
ok the sample size is small but the WTS and W$SD and AF indicate that you should fold to his reraise on the turn . basically after he reraises you on the turn you should fold . he almost never has Ax with that play and those stats. just my thoughts.

Lol the sample size is so low that your analysis is biased to statistics only in small % of the cases.

true i thought if you didn't consider his stats it was a clear fold.. suppose he is unknown. then he called PF with a reasonable hand. you don't call the raise you made with AQ, AJ or Ax whatever. you will mostly get called by a reasonable player with PP or suited connector if he is a bit loose pf. with that range in mind and that play you are definitely beat. The A didn't scare him a bit. instead he is reraising for more value. it's 2 pair +

this is statistically ,meaning most of the times this will happen..

Originally posted by spit22

Originally posted by Solomaextra

Originally posted by spit22
ok the sample size is small but the WTS and W$SD and AF indicate that you should fold to his reraise on the turn . basically after he reraises you on the turn you should fold . he almost never has Ax with that play and those stats. just my thoughts.

Lol the sample size is so low that your analysis is biased to statistics only in small % of the cases.

true i thought if you didn't consider his stats it was a clear fold.. suppose he is unknown. then he called PF with a reasonable hand. you don't call the raise you made with AQ, AJ or Ax whatever. you will mostly get called by a reasonable player with PP or suited connector if he is a bit loose pf. with that range in mind and that play you are definitely beat. The A didn't scare him a bit. instead he is reraising for more value. it's 2 pair +

this is statistically ,meaning most of the times this will happen..

You put him on that hand after his min3bet? Cause before that his line is no sense.

Yup, after the min3bet.
And btw, he may be fishy, but he has some idea when he will go allin if he raises or not.

yes after the min3bet.

So you mean I should fold after his min3bet? Ok.

I´d take b/f line on the turn, since it is hard him to call c/r with worse hands and if he shoves then you´re likely behind.