NL50 zoom SH 55 fold fullhouse

I think as played it's a good fold on the river. We only have a bluffcatcher, as most regs would never player weaker hands like this for value, especially 180bb deep. And as they also hardly bluff here, there is no point in bluffcatching, so folding seems fine.

About flop raise, would you get it in on the flop for 180bb?

Originally posted by duder1n0
I think as played it's a good fold on the river. We only have a bluffcatcher, as most regs would never player weaker hands like this for value, especially 180bb deep. And as they also hardly bluff here, there is no point in bluffcatching, so folding seems fine.

About flop raise, would you get it in on the flop for 180bb?

good question, I think it would be hard for us to go all in on turn that deep. So actually, when deeper stacked its better to call down the trips five here?

If you raise big OTF like 16-17BB and then he reraise you should fold. I wouldn`t play call/call/call.

I'm not sure what is the most +EV line, but I'd just call flop, as I'm not comfortable getting it in with bottom set for 180bb against an unknown. I have no problem with a calldown here, raise/calling seems kinda awkward, and I'd hate raise/folding against someone I have no reads on.

Being so deep i think just calling flop is kinda good. Btw you should use bigger sizings.

I don't agree with just calling on the flop. Even though when faced with a reraise we're often beat, it doesn't mean a raise for value is not a good idea, because villain b/c range is completely crushed against our hand, and his b/c range is a lot wider than his b/3b range.

So I'd always raise this flop. Against a reraise it would really depend on the size, on villain, on table dynamics... I might call his flop 3b.

And nice fold on the river buddy. Like already mentioned, we have a bluff catcher and it's very very unlikely villain is bluffing here. He needs to know your game really well or he needs to be a bit crazy in order to do that