For those of you that are thinking like Dykiller. Folding AA against multiple players going all in at any time (other than satellite bubble) is just terrible. It means that you haven't understood a basic concept of poker...a play isn't valued by the amount you end up winning/lossing in that hand, but by the amount you will end up winning/lossing after making that play 1000's of times. In this case it's just basic pot odds.
Here's an example:
If you think of a cash game, lets say 5 people go all-in for 1 buy in each and you have AA. Just for this example lets pretend you'll win 35% of the time. (I came up with this just by entering 5 random hands against AA in equilator) That means 35% of the time you win 5BI and 65% of the time you lose 1 buy in.
Here's the math:
0.35 x +5= +1.75
0.65 x -1= -0.65
1.75-0.65= +1.1 BI
So in this situation you'll lose the pot more often than you'll win it, but in the long run you will make on average 1.1 buy-in. That mean's on average you double your stack! Sounds good to me.
If you still think that in tourneys it's better to fold because you're more likely to make the money, then the same principal applies. If you fold your stack stays the same and you are more likely to make the money, but far less likely to go deep. If on average you're doubling your stack this is actually worth even more in a tourney than a cash game! The reason is that doubling your chips in a tourney gives you a huge advantage to try to make the final table/go for the win. Money is so weighted to the top spots in a tourney that it makes no sense to try to limp into the money and not take risks.
wow...that got longer than expected...at least I'm too hungover to do anything more worthwhile with my time right now