I think the call with T9s is good here. But why does Snowie recommend calling with 53s? I wouldn't even raise with 53s nevertheless call a raise. The small blind's range is usually very strong in this situation.
Notifications
Clear all
6 replies
Mmmm It is hard to say why 53s is recommended here.... My guessing is that it helps on low boards+ it is suited.
Originally posted by nitrol
Mmmm It is hard to say why 53s is recommended here.... My guessing is that it helps on low boards+ it is suited.
Yes, maybe but I'm still preplexed that 53s is a call. But after all, it is a hand that will be very easy to play post-flop in position. And you still have bluff-value if it comes to that. And it will be very deceptive if you flop a straight and your opponent is sitting with AA. He will probably pay off his entire stack.
I have fixed your picture here and it looks like an example of NL500.
So this kind of moves is most likely better on the higher limits than on the micro stakes as well, but I have no experience on that kind of limits as SNG player.
Cheers,
SDK1987
Originally posted by SDK1987
I have fixed your picture here and it looks like an example of NL500.
So this kind of moves is most likely better on the higher limits than on the micro stakes as well, but I have no experience on that kind of limits as SNG player.Cheers,
SDK1987
ok, well the stake shown there in the picture doesn't really matter. I am playing on 10NL. However Snowie might suggest another move if the opponent was a micro-stake player. But it is not programmed for those stakes anyway.
I see. Then you can ask yourself if this program is suitable if you play NL10 or less.
If you play like a NL100+ player on NL10 isn’t working most likely.