$0.50 / 9m / AQo

Looks pretty standard to me unless the BTN was super tight
Any reads on the CO & BTN?
Did the CO always open limp? Had the BTN been tight or aggressive?

I'm sorry, indeed I should have included some info on BTN and CO.

I saw CO limp-fold a few times prior to this hand and didnt have much info on BTN.

Cheers!

It seems like a standard iso-shove against a BTN shove. Even without antes in play.

Cheers,
SDK1987

If CO has been limp folding it looks like a good spot to shove for sure

agree with ppl nh wp

Is this reg speed?

I don't like this shove. Factoring in ICM tax, we need around 54-6% to make this shove profitably. We can get there, with no margin for error, if BTN shoves 44, A5s, A7o, KTs, KJo. But here's still a player to act after we shove, which should be considered.

I don't know if AQo is strong enough here.

The 50c STT’s are always the turbo variant and I expect the CO limper will pretty much always fold if we shove. So, I don’t think we need to count him to much in this situation.

I made an error in my above post. We actually need about 40% to break even, in chip ev. Adding ICM tax means we should, perhaps, only be happy to shove we have 45% or so. With the range I gave above, we have a 10% equity edge.

If we assume that BTN shoves the standard range, it should be a standard call. BTN shoves a wide range of hands here, any pair, any ace, suited kings down to about K6s, offsuited kings K9+, broadways, suited broadways, suited connectors, suited gappers We need 52% equity against his range.

I just assume that CO will fold.

Clear call if BTN isn´t a supertight nit or a normally loose passive player, raising the very first time.

well played - clear ISO. Only would think otherwise if seen CO trap again like that and if BTN is a total nit 6/3 type of guy.