Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] A great hand with an even better play.

12 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
666 Views
PatrikLarsson
Joined: 05.08.2008

0.5/1$ Limit Holdem (10 handed)

Players: BU 9.20$ BB 11.10$ SB 7.50$ UTG 22.30$ CO 55.80$

Preflop: Hero is BB with K :club: K :heart: SB bets UTG folds CO folds BU calls BB calls

Flop: 5 :club: 8 :club: 10 :spade: BB bets SB calls BU calls

Turn: Q :diamond: BB bets SB calls BU calls

River: J :heart: BB bets SB calls BU calls

Showdown: BB wins 10.2$ with a pair of Kings SB lost 3.5$ BB lost 3.5$


11 replies
numpaf
Joined: 11.03.2009

Why didn't you cap pre-flop?


PatrikLarsson
Joined: 05.08.2008

I set a trap by making my hand look weak to get payed, betting preflop would have been to obvious and would make the players fold.


numpaf
Joined: 11.03.2009

Well, then next time when someone suckout on you with a crazy two-pair or something, please don't complain here :f_cool:


I think you'd have gotten more value from the hand if you raised PF. If they called to showdown with worse hands, I doubt they'd have folded if faced with additional bet PF. Seeing as they didn't fold to your donkbet.

Edit: Why does this hand look so weird? BB acts before SB on flop and later streets, and SB raised PF before UTG acted? Or does your converter not record checks and folds all PF calls?

Second edit: I counted the bets and looked at the final pot won (10.2$) (shouldn't it be displayed as $10.20), and this doesn't make much sense. With a 5% rake, the total pot should be $10.74, and at 10% rake it should be $11.34 (The pot should actually have been $11.50 with a 8,5% rake to be equal $10.2) :/

Neither if your amounts make sense, as at these limits the total pot (rakeless) would be a number divisble by a Small Bet. (And none of the players went allin with their last few cents) Unless some information is missing, this hand doesn't make sense.

Info looks incomplete to me.


PatrikLarsson
Joined: 05.08.2008

Why cant a judge comment this?


kevvu
Joined: 11.05.2008

Nice hand, but i think preflopp raise should have been there.


gape0000
Joined: 28.08.2007

I think u played it really bad loosing value all over the place , first 3bet preflop and go on from there.


frzl
Joined: 25.04.2006

i´m kinda confused ^^
preflop SB acts first, then BU, then BB.
postflop BB acts first, then SB, then BU ^^

anyway: easy 3-bet preflop. your equity edge is huge, nobody will give you any credit and especially at the lowest limits there is absolutely no reason to slowplay preflop. this isn´t nl and this isn´t HSP :)

postflop looks ok (but weird).

Originally posted by PatrikLarsson
Why cant a judge comment this?

well you posted the hand about 1 day ago... considering the fact that
- i´m doing this part of the forum almost on my own right now
- this is not my full time job or anything
- i´m not getting paid a single cent but still doing this just to help you guys out

-> you should show a little more patience imo -.-


PatrikLarsson
Joined: 05.08.2008

I thought there was more than one judge here?(
but I agree that I should have raised even harder but I like fixed limit holdem=)


hand: easy cap preflop and bet all streets

i'd laugh so bad if an A came on flop and you'd get beaten by A2o or maybe by 72o two pair. so trapping preflop with cowboys is a no-go ;).

extremely bad played btw .


hand as posted looks strange, anyway, my two pennyworth;

definitely rpf, bet all streets, job done easy money! ;-)