Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Aa Nl50 Sh

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
55 Views
Marg0z
Joined: 10.04.2008

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $0.50(BB) Replayer
Hero ($107)
BB ($153)
UTG ($48.35)
UTG+1 ($23.05)
CO ($55.30)
BTN ($49.40)

Dealt to Hero A♥A♦

UTG+1 calls $0.50, fold, BTN raises to $1, Hero raises to $4, UTG calls $3.50, fold, BTN calls $3,

FLOP ($12.50) 3♠T♠4♦

Hero bets $8.50, UTG calls $8.50, BTN folds,

TURN ($29.50) 3♠T♠4♦J♠

Hero ???

Opp is 35/25
wts: 60
af: 1.4
fold to c-bet: 50%

(The same guy as next hand posted by me :) )


3 replies

bet/fold vs 1.4 af


Marg0z
Joined: 10.04.2008

But if i bet about 18,5$ and he shoves : to call: 17$ pot : 84$


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Yep, i think bet/folding is not an option given the stacksizes.

So you have to choose betwenn bet/calling, check/raising and check/folding.
If you think he is floating in this spot oftentimes -> c/r.
If you think he had a FD most of the time -> c/f.
But personally i think i'd bet/call in this spot.
His limp/call looks like a SC or small PP for the most part, after he calls the flopbet he still has most of the small PPs in this range, at least a lot more than FDs that are now flushes.
The first reason is he'd check back his small PPs most of the time (at least that's what i think he will do), sometimes he might have a spade with his PP so you should bet for protection.
The second reason for betting is that he could actually call you with worse hands like a weird played high pocket pair or Tx, maybe he even calls his small PP again because he has a spade.
If he happens to have JT you still have 8 outs.
And the third reason is that this guy could still be floating, so you have some additional foldequity.