KK vs low wet board

nice hand, but your thought process is off. you should put villain on a range.

Originally posted by mjez1
I don't put him on set.

that range obviously includes all sets, straights, two pair. now you have to find out, wether you are still ahead vs his continuing range to be able to value bet.

Originally posted by Pokamon
that range obviously includes all sets, straights, two pair. now you have to find out, wether you are still ahead vs his continuing range to be able to value bet.

Do you really thing the villain would call 22 and 33 or 44 or 23 or 34 etc after 3bet?

obviously they do all the time (and w a 100bb stack rightfully so).

the above is a chart showing CO vs SB 3-bet. when you check your 3-bet success, you will probaly find, that people defend even wider.

(yellow is call. green is 4-bet.)

Well with that stack villain probably should not call to set mine versus 4x 3bet. But obviously can still do it. But we should not be that worried of those as villain can also have more overpairs, fd and some Ax with bd fd that could be sticky. Perhaps some A4s type also.

Villain is a fish 100%. No point really in giving them a range.
You have one of the best hands you can have on this board, and fish will stack off with a lot of worse hands.
Get the money in! Nice hand!

Indeed. On NL2 it's a no brainer stack of against most players. Especially against a short stack.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Do you really thing the villain would call 22 and 33 or 44 or 23 or 34 etc after 3bet?

Yes, of course they can have that in their range, recreational players love to set mine. But I'm also not folding on this flop, there str8 draws and flush draws and over pairs in his range.