[Closed] Nl4 Sh - Ak

Interesting hand, difficult situation.

Additional question for handjudge: What could his min-raise on the flop mean? Who the hell minraises this flop?

Maybe QQ, JJ, 99 or even AJ? Tho this min-raise looks more like cheap attempt to bluff me out of the hand in case I have the AQ or AK as I had this time.

Originally posted by randompkr
Maybe QQ, JJ, 99 or even AJ? Tho this min-raise looks more like cheap attempt to bluff me out of the hand in case I have the AQ or AK as I had this time.

Yeah I think the same.

So you would shove after his min-raise?

no lol ♦.

Is he's bluffing I think you can't do much about it? If he has a nice draw you won't loose him with a small raise. And yeah you'll be comitted pretty soon. You're gonna hate a lot of turns. It's probably not a pure bluff like 83o.

His raise seems donkey, but I am wondering if he can make enough hands fold
to maybe make it +ev ???

He randompkr, I was overlooking your stack sizes a bit in the last post and didn't understand why you were talking about pushing.

I thought of something that might reduce his bluffing amount here:
Your stacks were both $4.44 to the flop, right?
If you bet like $1 on the flop your stack would be $3.44
It would seem more like you have something to protect, plus he must realize he can't raise with a bluff or a draw here because you are very likely to put in the rest of your money.
When you bet the $0.75, he can raise without being comitted.

Just a little difference, but I think he would play way more straightforward.

Originally posted by Ka0s
He randompkr, I was overlooking your stack sizes a bit in the last post and didn't understand why you were talking about pushing.

I thought of something that might reduce his bluffing amount here:
Your stacks were both $4.44 to the flop, right?
If you bet like $1 on the flop your stack would be $3.44
It would seem more like you have something to protect, plus he must realize he can't raise with a bluff or a draw here because you are very likely to put in the rest of your money.
When you bet the $0.75, he can raise without being comitted.

Just a little difference, but I think he would play way more straightforward.

I was just a little misunderstanding by me. It wouldn't make any sense pushing flop after his min-raise, I know. And yes, I think that my bet size was little bit too small also. Still I'm little bit confused, should I c-bet flops like this after 3-betting PF?

Okay, the way I play AKo if there are a raise b4 is that I just call and see a flop but if ur villain is a random fish its really hard to put him on a hand so a fold is best option without hitting.

Originally posted by Ka0s
Interesting hand, difficult situation.

Additional question for handjudge: What could his min-raise on the flop mean? Who the hell minraises this flop?

to induce shove by worse hands
you don´t have to raise big in 3-bet pots to get money all-in
some players would do that with flushdraw, some with nuts, some with top pair
I think b/f there is better than bet/shove
just wait for right hand, if player is aggressive you can also c/f flop