[Closed] 99

i like bet/fold Turn, because he can call some lower PP and if he calls, you can easy c/f the river.
If you think he is floating a lot it is ok to c/c Turn.
The River depends on your reads- do you think he is able to 2nd barrel his bluff? How does he play his draws(aggressive,passive on flop)
You have to question-which hand do you represent ? bet flop,c/c Turn looks like a pair of Ts a medium PP or maybe an OP you decided to c/c 2 streets. So he only gets you off your medium PP.
If he plays his draws passive on flop, maybe its a call.
I think i fold it without better reads.

if you c/c turn, then you should c/c river, since your hand looks exactly which it is- medium pp or weak Tx hands that can´t stand turn raise
if player owns you then you can adjust your calling down strategy

Originally posted by Kojak2330
I think he could bet a Ten again but the betsize is too big for a valuebet with the Ten. Possible is a bluff or sth like 56,67,88, TT or a missed FD .
Can i call the river?

there should be more combos of value hands that beat u than busted fds imo. even 67 hit now on the river.
if he is not capable of pure floating the flop w/QJo etc (which i doubt at nl100) i would consider his range weighted towards 75/25 value vs bluff range.

however, what makes the river even more a fold for me on nl100 vs a standard reg is betsizing.

exactly 10 into 16.5 on the turn in combination with a bomberman bet of 35 into 36.5 on the river smells a bit like "i dont want u to fold the turn, pls stay in the pot ...... and pls pay me off bigtime on the river".

ofc, he might know how i interpret his betsizing and level me into a fold w/ the best hand ... but its nl100 and i doubt that to happen too often.

w/o history, flow, levelling etc, just make the hand easier to play and b/f turn.

I would bet bigger on the flop and i'm definitely betting the turn (bigger, too).
He plays 18/15, there's not much room for calling SCs preflop so he has a pocket pair most of the time.
The problem is that he probably won't bet 88-66 and even check behind FDs on the turn.
So the better play is to get value from 88-66, maybe you get a fold from some FDs which is good because they give up a reasonable amount of pot-EQ and at the same time wouldn't necessarily semibluffraise the turn so you don't need to fear getting blown out of the pot with the better hand if he raises.
And furthermore most players would raise sets and strong draws on this flop, so his range is even more weighted towards PPs.

The cool thing about the turnbet is that you can check the river and very very easily fold to a bet because he will check behind almost any hand that you're ahead of.
If he happens to have a FD at the river and bets it when checked to theres just nothing you can do - but again this is a very small part of his bettingrange there.

Originally posted by Bierbaer
I would bet bigger on the flop and i'm definitely betting the turn (bigger, too).
He plays 18/15, there's not much room for calling SCs preflop so he has a pocket pair most of the time.
The problem is that he probably won't bet 88-66 and even check behind FDs on the turn.
So the better play is to get value from 88-66, maybe you get a fold from some FDs which is good because they give up a reasonable amount of pot-EQ and at the same time wouldn't necessarily semibluffraise the turn so you don't need to fear getting blown out of the pot with the better hand if he raises.
And furthermore most players would raise sets and strong draws on this flop, so his range is even more weighted towards PPs.

The cool thing about the turnbet is that you can check the river and very very easily fold to a bet because he will check behind almost any hand that you're ahead of.
If he happens to have a FD at the river and bets it when checked to theres just nothing you can do - but again this is a very small part of his bettingrange there.

♠_thumbsup:

very true. listen to bierbaer.