Hello,
i am quite new to PokerStrategy and I started playing the extended Short Stack Strategy as i found it quite interesting because its hard to form rules for no limit hold'em in general cause it is extremly situational.
Anyway after i found this site i started playing this strategy with my cousin. We both use Teamspeak to discuss our descisions. Its easier to spot someone else's mistakes if he hes planning on making one i think. So far we both experience variances not are not extrem yet alarming as we both dont see any winning tendency. We only played over 1k raked hands together so far. I know that is definately not enough from the mathematical point of view to talk about average related topic like poker winning. But i have seen many people here posting about constant losses with SSS. The usual answers are "You have to be patient" (always true in poker, i know) or "you are probably doing something wrong, post some hands" (i love the sample hands section. I read a lot there and the answers are always nice).
I am down to 42 dollars now. My high peak was 53 dollars, close to the beginning. In between i was down to 46 and came back to 49 i think. In my last session i fell down to 42.
My cousin started constantly losing. Fell down to 48, came back a little, fell down to 44 and is now back around 49 i think.
Alright, as i said i know that we have to be patient, and variances are totally normal. I also think i can come back from my 42 maybe but i dont see to make constant winning. I understand that from the mathematical point of view teh SSS guarantees to win over the long term and thats why i found it so interesting, but so far it doesnt seem to work for us on the lower limits. We are both playing NL10. I am quite sure we both dont make common mistakes. We have played on a different Poker Network before. I for myself have read a few Poker books like Gordon, Brunson, Sklansky... Gordon 3 times as i found it the most usefull for no limit ringgames. We both understand the concepts of position play, pot/implied/reverse odds (only pot odds required in SSS). I would also say that i can distinguish between a good and a bad (dangerous) board pattern. This is definately not enough to be good in poker and that is why we are here
We both werent confident with our play even though we made small winnings on NL25 with Big Stacks, but there was no real confidence. But this very little experience we have definately helps minimizing mistakes made with SSS, as both think to have understood how to play it.
We have both the starting hand chart printed out. I havent played a single hand different to the chart for sure! I have definately made mistakes. I know of 2 mistakes that cost me 2 dollars in total and i know of one mistake that actually gained me a 1.50. I also dont think i have been extremly unlucky. I havent lost to smaller pockets yet, neither have i won with smaller ones vs overpockets
I seem to catch my 1/3 of flushes and OESDs.
Today when i lost the most i actually didnt even lose it by going all in. The most problems i had was doing continuation bets.
I have AK UTG, rase to 0.40. CO calls.
The flop cames something low like 4 5 8 (i had 3 of these flops with AK and AQ). The pot is 0.95. I have to bet 1/2 pot according to the SSS. They either raised or called me. When called and i didnt made my hand on the turn i had to check. They bet into me im out.
So far i have made the same experience all the time but today it extreme cause maybe i was unlucky and didnt hit the flop often enough. The people on NL10 i play dont like to fold a hand for 40 or 50 cent after they callt a raise preflop. They like their hand. Maybe few of them hit their small pockets, maybe they were too bad to reraise with TT or higher. Its hard to believe all of them did and its also hard to believe they all had Ax and flopped TPTK. I personally think i had the best hand with AK there few times but this bet just looks weak and those people love their K9s or J10o. I also thing it is bad to depend the bet size on the strength of the hand. This is a betting pattern any decent player in NL is looking for in his opponents. Ok the extended SSS offers a little more variance there, as it proposes to bet 2/3 instead of pot size when there is no draw on the board and you have a made hand. I even got a few check raises when i was in position and made a continuation bet.
Dont get me wrong. I dont say i should only bet when i have something. This is of course worse (in general) and when i played Big Stack i tried to stick to phil gordon's ideas on continuation bets. I even thin this might work better on NL25 or NL50 as people tend to see the money on microlimits. It seems to be a difference to them wether they put 5 BB on NL10 (50 cent) or on NL25 (1.25) into the pot.
Wow this posting has become long and i am sorry to take you time here
At the moment i am just a little afraid this SSS might not work for me and i already wasted 1/5 of the money YOU gave to me as a gift!!! I really really dont wanna lose my gift. I am gonna watch the TeamSpeak coaching on SSS. I think its on tuesday but i am already about to switch to the Big Stack Strategy that is offered here or to FL as i found it quite Interesting what Stefan (headadmin) wrote about it here in the forum.
I am gratefull for any reply here no matter if its hard critics. Anything will help ![]()
Best regards, Barbara

