Midlife Crisis? What Midlife Crisis?

jbpatzer · 2010-06-24T10:48:39Z

After reading endless blogs by students and 20-somethings, some of which are very entertaining, I thought it might be nice to write my own, focussing on the what it's like to try to play poker when you have stuff going on in your life that tends to get in the way. Reading blogs by people like TwiceT just makes me feel simultaneously jealous, old and also relieved that I'm not that young any more (this will only make sense to the over 40's). I have a) A wife b) Three kids, ages 3, 8 and 15. Anyone like to guess which one is the most troublesome? c) A full time job d) 44 years of wear and tear, both mental and physical, to cope with. e) An unfortunate tendency to compile lists. About me --------- I'm a maths professor at a British University. I'm not going to say which, as I want to stay anonymous. I'd be horrified if any of my students worked out that this is me. However, it's a very good university, and if you do work out which one it is, you should definitely encourage your teenage children to come here. I specialise in mathematical methods and modelling, mainly continuum mechanics, but I'm trying to learn some game theory in a feeble attempt to improve my poker (more on this later). I used to be a keen and quite good sportsman (cricket and badminton) but dodgy ankles have recently caught up with me, and I'm slowly expanding (think Jabba the Hut!). Poker does not help much in this regard. I've always been interested in games. My grandparents taught me a rummy-like game called Kalooki (just googled this and found there's a web site! Can't believe it!) and we used to play for Licourice Allsorts, so I suppose I have a history of gambling from an early age. Remember, no video games and no internet when I was a kid. I also used to play Bridge (badly) when I was a teenager, mainly because my friend and I could play at the Bridge evening at our local tennis club when we were too young to get into the pub, and get served at the bar (50p a pint!). There was one memorable occasion when we went to the Young Chelsea Bridge Club (so many wanky posh kids there!) to play a duplicate tournament, and my mate wandered off to the bar mid game, and had to be dragged off the fruit machine claiming he was too pissed to carry on. We finished exactly half way and earned Bridge Master Points. Who says it's a game of skill! Anyway, I haven't played Bridge for years, but I've always been a keen chess player and still turn out for my local team (current grade 170 BCF = 2000 ELO for those who know about these things. County standard for those who don't.). Edit: For all you Americans, 'pissed' means drunk. We say 'pissed off' when you say 'pissed'. Me and Poker ------------- I always thought that poker was a game invented in Westerns as an excuse for people to shoot each other, and that it was now mainly played by Texans in silly hats and gangsters. Of course, I was right, but it turned out that normal people can have fun playing it too. I discovered this last August when my brother-in-law showed me that you could play Zynga poker on Facebook. I quickly became hooked, and after about 6 weeks could even reliably remember that a full house beats a flush. I have a shed load of books on chess, so it seemed only natural to get some on poker. Started with the books by Harrington (brilliant!) and Moshman (also brilliant, but what a dreadful writer. His style makes the average scientific paper look like it was written by Nick Hornby.). Then found I could win tons of chips on Zynga using Moshman's SnG tactics. I decided it was time to play for money. I deposited $50 on 888 poker, nearly lost all of it immediately, but fluked my way into 3rd place in a new depositer's freeroll for $50. Managed to build my BR up to $100 playing cash and SnGs, then withdrew my initial $50, and haven't deposited since. This is an essential element, as my wife thought I was going to become addicted to gambling and throw away all our money. I assured her that I am addicted to poker, not gambling. This does however mean that my BR management is very conservative, as I will be in big trouble with her if I ever have to redeposit, and I want to keep my gonads intact for now. Discovered pokerstrategy.com last November, eagerly claimed my $50, and started playing on FT. I've tried lots of different games on there and had some success with super turbos, rush and steps. I also continued playing on 888 and came 2nd for $150 in a $2 MTT. Once my bankroll reached $350, I deposited on Pokerstars and, inspired by chenny's TableNinja video, have been 12 tabling $3.40 SnGs to try to clear my bonus ($110 so far, and as a nice side effect, gold status. I'm going to have a break to read some gold articles and watch some gold videos over the next couple of weeks). After trying lots of different formats, I feel I want to concentrate on SnGs and MTTs...

Meemawuk

Joined: 27.05.2009

Posts: 758

15.11.2010, 14:04 0

Originally posted by chenny8888

Originally posted by Meemawuk
The problem with optimal strategy is that you don't give yourself many opportunities to get above the EV line because you inevitably have the best hand the majority of the time.

The times you do have the worst hand and manage to get lucky, you recoup 1BI, which doesn't compensate emotionally/psychologically for the 3/4 you lost in the session when guys sucked out on you. I guess this is just a consequence of having the best hand so often.

please post this on 2p2 so i can reply with something rude/witty/something-coaches-probably-shouldn't-say ;)/

in the meantime i will just say: that's not how ev works

Wow I re-read this and it doesn't make sense to me either. My point wasn't even supposed to be about EV. It was about the frequency with which a good player gets it in good resulting in an increased quantity of so called 'bad beats'. Some players struggle to deal with with the increased quantity of times where it seems like you're 'getting unlucky' compared to times where you 'get lucky'. I think this creates an illusion for many poker players that they are somehow inherantly unlucky when the reality is that they aren't losing a disproportionate number of times. I see this to be particularly true for live players.

I'll put it down to it being late and me being tired and having jsut read 5 pages of JB complaining about being below EV.... :f_p:

The temptation to troll 2+2 with my post is huge!

Reply

Quote

Meemawuk

Joined: 27.05.2009

Posts: 758

15.11.2010, 14:09 0

Originally posted by jbpatzer
Sadly, one of the few things I have managed to pass on to him is my questionable and generally unhelpful taste in heavy rock. But did listen to A Farewell To Kings (1977), which has always been one of my favourites. Was there a heavier band in 1977? So many classic tracks.

King Crimson?

Edit: I'm not entirely sure about this sugguestion hence the question mark, but some elements are certainly very heavy.

Reply

Quote

jbpatzer

Joined: 23.11.2009