Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
Originally posted by fembot26
Increasing the rake on micro-stakes SNGs, especially on the MTTs by the look of it, seems like a really punitive and ill-considered move on PokerStars' part. Burdening the poor with extra taxes might work in a real economy, but in the online poker economy the poor can just vote with their feet and stop playing. And that's where it does resemble a real economy: without the poor, no one can get rich.
Originally posted by harzfear
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here
Originally posted by harzfear
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here
##
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
Originally posted by BugRoger
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here
# xxx
!!!
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
If you want to see his responses go here. http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/pokerstars-sit-go-changes-effective-may-6th-2011-a-1033408/
Post 578 I think, he states Stars will be addressing us by Wednesday. All I can say is it had beetter be one heck of an addresss!!
Originally posted by Xantos
Fixed the images in the head post - can someone confirm they can be seen please?![]()
yes we can
Originally posted by Andy78ma
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
Originally posted by Midazolam
Originally posted by Xantos
Fixed the images in the head post - can someone confirm they can be seen please?![]()
yes we can
Merci bien!
Originally posted by Sequeezer
Originally posted by dubadal
Originally posted by Andy78ma
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
btw: not sure if i like the rake changes at all, seems like there are many many players that now have to pay a lot more rake because most of us play low/midstakes and this is where the increase is.
I like the fact that u closed some gaps like from 6$ to 16$ sngs etc
also i read this on 2+2 and think this might be a good idea:
"The 21.70 9man turbo must be in the low buy in tab."
Originally posted by Morrus
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers
Originally posted by chrisbet
Originally posted by Morrus
Originally posted by xJCzZ
Steve we would really appreciate direct responses here cheers