Originally posted by aanty2000
but i think beting the turn gives us some fold equity.
We got no fold equity against better hands.
Originally posted by aanty2000
i think we are way ahead of his range
Just because we are ahead of one's range, doesn't mean we should bet.
Originally posted by aanty2000
beting turn and folding to an allin bet on the river makes as lose the same money if we check the turn and call a donk bet on the river
IMO, the problem here, is that you're not thinking on longterm.
Just to simplify things, let's suppose there are absolutely no draws on the board (I know there are, but it's very unlikely he's on a draw.).
If you bet turn, you may "help" him lay down a worse hand. Like a weaker Ace, a K, an eight, or a pp. While he'll still call (or raise) with A8, AK, 88, AA or KK. (But AK, AA and KK are unlikely, and if he had 22 it's just bad luck).
So you'll be mostly be putting money in the pot when you're behind.
If you check the turn. You induce a bluff from worse hands, like Ax, a K, an 8, a pp or even a pure bluff.
So you'll get more value from worse hands than if you had bet the turn.
In addition to that he gets less value from you if he has you beat.
Of course if the board was draw-heavy you'd have to forget about pot control and protect the hand IMO, if he had a better hand, nothing you can do about it I think.
Originally posted by aanty2000
we know that he had kings here and i guess you talk about the hand knowing the results .
I just saw the results now that you've mentioned. ♦
And I'm pretty sure Thorsten didn't talk about the hand letting the results influence his thinking process.
Hope I could help.