Hello NewwWorld
Thanks for dropping by. Hopefully I can clear a few things up for you.
Originally posted by NewwWorld
Poker evolves so fast and theres so many coaches out there, i don't see why you cant make a graph and stats of ur winrate of only 2013?
The HM2 graph is as current as some-time in february. The micro-stakes games haven't changed that much since then. It's true poker is constantly evolving, but in reality this evolution is not gradual and is very often caused by specific incidents such as black-friday where the games take a noted shift.
Part of the reason I do not want to add a new graph just yet is that I have mainly been playing 200nl (and some higher) for the past few months. I don't want to upload graphs of 200nl in order to prove that I can beat lower limits. I am very careful with certain types of information, and feel it is a negative freeroll to give away such info at this stage. This is a coaching thread, not a blog. These graphs will be uploaded later in the year if/when I decide to expand my coaching to include 200nl.
What is the metric we use to determine whether someone is a good coach. Is it really the winrate? Would you rather get coached by someone who puts in 20k hands a month, 2tables, only plays when they feel good, and has a winrate of 8bb/100bb? Or by someone who 16 tables, puts in 150k hands a month and has a winrate of 4bb/100? Winrate essentially proves nothing, there are far more important metrics.
You will also notice that some coaches put an extremely limited sample size of hands up in their thread. Anyone can run good over 100k hands. 800k hands is more than you will see on most other coaching threads, so on some level I'm surprised people are still requesting more hands.
It's also possible for a very good player to be a very bad coach; if they don't have the ability to explain concepts in a way that can be understood. This can also occur if a coach skips over relevant details not related directly to game strategy, such as bankroll management, mindset issues, and practical knowledge about poker-software/clients etc.
It's really good that you are taking the time to do some research. Many people ask the same questions as you. Essentially they are not asking the right questions though. If you want to know whether someone is good, you can only really establish that by watching them play and hearing their thoughts.