hit my first volume target for HUNL 
next milestone Ive set myself is 10k, by which time I hope to move up 
35bb/100
Notifications
Clear all
23 replies
Originally posted by conall88
lol not a chance. $1600 and counting now. easy game
LOL in advanced for when you hit a proper downswing and smash your computer up.
Enjoy it when it comes 
IPN, 3-500 hands/hr 1-2 tabling.
session times range from 20mins-2hrs, but I dont play a lot.
once BR hits $2500 Im gonna get some HUNL coaching methinks and attempt to take it up a notch.
notice near the end when my red line gets flatish, thats where I start 2 tabling a stationey ( terribad) reg ♦
taking stabs at 100NL once ive finished playing 10k hands.
Originally posted by conall88
IPN, 3-500 hands/hr 1-2 tabling.
I reckon you put quality over quantity but isn't it still kinda boring to play 3 hands/hr?
Trolled.
dude i play a person, then end my session. i dont play volume. whats wrong with that.
Really good to see! Just watched the vid of your HU play being reviewed and was peeved at one of the PS members commenting that you were bad. I thought your response was concise and understated and probably indicated as much about your character as it did about his/hers. Goodonya!
Originally posted by kbwinsagain
Just watched the vid of your HU play being reviewed
Where?
Originally posted by fuzzyfish
Originally posted by conall88
IPN, 3-500 hands/hr 1-2 tabling.I reckon you put quality over quantity but isn't it still kinda boring to play 3 hands/hr?
Trolled.
I lol´d too hard ♦
Originally posted by THESHade
Originally posted by kbwinsagain
Just watched the vid of your HU play being reviewedWhere?
Originally posted by kbwinsagain
Originally posted by THESHade
Originally posted by kbwinsagain
Just watched the vid of your HU play being reviewedWhere?
That's an old vid, pretty sure he improved greatly since then
lol yeah, me and my donkey plays
just because my answer was concise doesn't mean it was correct 
Originally posted by conall88
lol yeah, me and my donkey plays
just because my answer was concise doesn't mean it was correctI wasn't actually commenting on the quality of your play - it's fairly obvious from Chenny's commentary that you had a bit to work on. I was merely feeding back my satisfaction that you had enjoyed success after being dubbed a "bad" player by a fellow member. Your response at the time was to admit your shortcomings and explain that's why you were prepared to be (publicly) reviewed. I think it takes great courage to open yourself up for critique on a public forum (and extreme cowardice to criticise someone who is prepared to expose their play for the benefit of others).
In case I haven't made myself clear, I am patting you on the back for allowing the original critique from Chenny to be publicly aired (regardless of how long ago it was), for not taking the "bad" play criticism to heart and for making the necessary changes to enjoy success.