Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;SB$2,72:50/24/14/13,0/29/50/-/50;Hero$1,27:///////;[/tg]
0,01/0,02 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant.Base 0.99 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is BB with 8♣, 7♦
7 folds, SB calls $0,01, Hero checks.
Flop: ($0,04) 8♥, 7♠, 7♣ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0,02, SB raises to $0,10, Hero calls $0,08.
Turn: ($0,24) 5♥ (2 players)
SB bets $0,18, Hero raises to $0,44, SB raises to $1,56, Hero calls $0,71 (All-In), SB gets uncalled bet back.
River: ($2,54) 4♥ (2 players)
Final Pot: $2,54
Results follow (highlight to see):
SB shows (7h 6s)
Hero shows a full-house, sevens full of eights (8c 7d)
Hero wins with a full-house, sevens full of eights (8c 7d)
This was a pretty interesting hand.
I do the usual BB "freeplay check" and end up hitting a perfect flop... which (so I think) was absolutely safe, and I figured from previous hands and his stats that my opponent was an absolute maniac... so I decided that I'd let him start the action.
My questions:
- Was it the right thing to slowplay him?
- By highlighting the results you can see his hand... which conclusions should I draw about him?
