well, i also got frequent steals on rush with raising smaller ♦ i mean, people are so nitty and usually quickfolding before they even see your raise anyway. and do you really want them to overcommit when you hit just a top pair with your KQ?
if they want to "adapt" and call more you can usually outplay them postflop (and damn, i suck but even i could say this)
of course adapt slightly to table stats but anyway
now i'll back it up with some math
(i'll add some quick explanation to our more casual readers)
stealingEV = foldProbability*blindsWon - callProbability*blindsLost
fP*bW = cP*bL (EV = 0 to calculate the folding probability needed to break even)
fP = cP*bL/bW
fP = (1-fP)*bL/bW (call probability is just 100% minus the times they fold)
blindstealing with 6BB:
fP = (1-fP)*6/1.5
fP = (1-fP)*4
fP+4*fP = 4
fP = 0,8 (has to work more than 80% of the time to be profitable, not considering postflop)
blindstealing with 3.5xBB:
fP = (1-fP)*3.5/1.5
3*fP = (1-fP)*7
3*fP+7*fP = 7
fP = 0,7 (has to work more than 70% of the time to be profitable, not considering postflop)
so, well, we're already raising from UTG. does investing a whole 2.5BB more increase our fold equity that much? we can argue over whether the fold equity increases by 10%
and about postflop play, cbet profit, etc of course...
but i guess it doesn't really matter. may be a matter of style, if it works just go on with it ♦
...
just talking about blind stealing in rush games get me thrilled already. i can't wait to move my roll to stars ♦