33$ 5mx 70:30 KT re-steal vs midstack bubble

Well I am usually bit hesitant to really shove light or even decent broadway hand in these spots versus competent reg. He should understand this is decent spot for bubble abuse so why is he offering one. It would also be perfectly reasonable for him to shove with some hands that are going to show profit, but ones he cannot raise-call or which are very marginal raise-call hands. After all open shoving likely show more profit with those hands even if his open shove range does become bit capped. But how wide you should resteal depends a lot in earlier history.

AJ+(ATs), 88+ or bit tighter would be ok range to induce I suppose. Depend how wild you get in this spot. But personally I would be folding a lot in BU shoes and open shoving decent amount of hands. After all versus aggro chip leader minraising is like offering chips on silver plate and I would not be happy to do that without balanced range. So my minraise hands would be ones I am inducing plus some hands I can easily raise-fold. How much I am raise-folding then depends on history and will be changing from time to time. Versus somewhat non adjusting reg in BB my minraise range might be actually very trap heavy as they just check: "I have to shove this light to abuse"

When he minraise he is also blocking collision of SB and BB, which obviously has quite lot of value if SB is aggressively shoving and BB knowing that will call pretty wide.

But really if BU would be open raising 32% here versus aggro chip leader I would not define him as competent reg...

Makes sense. Thanks for the response. What hands do you open shove?

22-66(77), Axs , KTs, KQo type of hands?

As usual i agree with everything ghaleon said. I would prolly just shove close to Nash here (i'm guessing it's not as low as 22 plus). The more aggro SB is, the more hands i fold, b/c chance of bvb collision increases.

i agree with ghaleon too. villain will open ship some nash hands and raise/fold SOMETIMES, but r/c traps . i think its too risky to abuse here vs a competent player